Discussion » Statements » Rosie's Corner » How can you call anything a witch hunt BEFORE the fact of presentation of evidence? You are ignorant so you are uninformed aren't you?
RosieG

How can you call anything a witch hunt BEFORE the fact of presentation of evidence? You are ignorant so you are uninformed aren't you?

Now AFTER the fact when all the evidence/proof/lack thereof is presented then and only then can you label it "witch hunt" if in fact nothing is found. Remember the 8 Republican Benghazi investigations? That was a witch hunt.  Nothing was found. Well Mueller and/or the southern district  of New York are only just beginning the process. Only THEY know what evidence they have. Of course Michael Cohen knows what he did, what he has and what he fears and what he is trying to hide. I figger donjohn knows too or at least that part that pertains to him and that is why he is labeling it a witch hunt so his adoring worshippers will not believe anything that is found out or uncovered. He is telling them it is all a sham, an act, a fake, a phony. Will they buy it again and again and again and again etcetera and so forth? Of course they will. They buy anything he sells and they pay twice the price and they don't care. He has a sure thing going for him. What's not to love? What could it hurt?.

Posted - April 10, 2018
Tags : None

Responses


  • 1233
    It doesn't matter whether there is evidence or not. A witch hunt is a witch hunt based on the INTENTIONS of the prosecutor. Something is a witch hunt when they're looking for an EXCUSE to indict someone not JUST CAUSE to indict them.

    The Stormy Daniels thing, even if everything alleged is true, is not criminal. All they're trying to do, is gather some embarrassing evidence and then try to catch him making an inaccurate statement under oath. It's pure entrapment.
      April 10, 2018 9:55 AM MDT
    4

  • 7280
    Good to know someone on here can read minds.  I need to know the intentions some of my friends have--just for kicks of course.  Can you help?
     
      April 10, 2018 1:38 PM MDT
    1

  • 1233
    I just explained what a witch hunt is. My point is Rosie is wrong to think that only the innocent can be the victim of a witch hunt. Everyone is technically guilty of something if they look hard enough. Their favourite trick is endless cross examination about something complex that the subject doesn't clearly remember. Eventually they can trick you into making an inaccurate statement that they can claim is perjury. You'd need to be a saint with a photographic memory to escape them if they really decide to come after you.

    I think Mueller is a seditious piece of sh*t who deserves to rot in federal prison. That's just an opinion and I don't claim that it is anything else. I don't claim psychic powers, just keen instincts. Intuition is the foundation of most political beliefs. Most of it comes down to judging the trustworthiness of various sources of information. Anyone who doesn't have pretty keen instincts will be deceived.

    Are you implying your political views don't rely on such intuition?
      April 10, 2018 3:35 PM MDT
    4

  • 35529
    Exactly....show me the person...I will show you the crime.
      April 10, 2018 3:40 PM MDT
    4

  • 7280
    I agree that certain things are reasonably inferred from some actions---fortunately, men of integrity are capable of doing the "right" thing without having ulterior motives.

    Seditious---inciting or causing people to rebel against the authority of a state or monarch.

    As you say, it is only your opinion---On the other hand, I would rather have him to protect me than you with all your guns---I have no problem with guns, but Mueller's weapons have greater range and power than even a 50 cal..
      April 11, 2018 3:02 PM MDT
    0

  • 113301
    :):):)
      April 11, 2018 4:15 AM MDT
    0