.
Wasn't it Karl Popper who said something like "You cannot really prove a theory; you can only disprove it by citing one exception."?
Oh, that's good. :)
And given that our solar system is in the shape of an atom, imagine that we all could be part of one tiny atom in the fingernail of some giant being. Wow - cosmic, man!
That's pretty amazing, when you go back through the era's of time.
I see no reason to believe that everyone has a unique fingerprint.
Yes there are many possible combinations and duplication between any two random individuals is extremely unlikely but at the same time it would be impossible to prove all are unique without comparing billions.
On the other side, a single set of matching prints could disprove this.
You would also have to define what it means to match. Of course looking at each atom no fingerprints would match, but that also means the same person's fingerprint would not match from one moment to the next. So a better definition would probably be that they match well enough that it can't be determined if a print is from one person or another. I suggest that that greatly reduces how many possible fingerprints there are to go around the world and there is likely duplication somewhere, somehow.
Nice analogy, Stu :)
I have a lovely book by Mir Bashir which teaches psychological palm reading.
Yes it is, isn't it?
It is mind boggling. Did you bring the snowflakes into your answer because they take a variety of shapes and patterns?