Um yes, but I am seriously not proud of what I uploaded.. it was footage of two of my car accidents :( It was private and only for the insurance company.
Sorry to disappoint but I thought you knew that when you upload you can actually choose whether to make it public or accessible by a link only.. I chose the latter.. so the vids appear to me when I look at my profile, but only those who are invited via the link can see them.
What makes you think I'm "disappointed"? All I did was ask you why you did it. I'm not even sure where in the heck that came from, but anyway, I know very little about youtube, I've hardly ever fiddled around with it, so that's why I asked.
Tis just an expression sweetness, honestly no need to get mad, "that" I think, I perhaps felt your tone had been a little accusatory - "Why did you... public forum?" I perhaps placed emphasis on public and why.. your use of language is arguably more direct than mine, perhaps we tend to use language more floriferously. I think this is where we sometimes have difficulties because things that are said there and the way they are said can come across aggressively here, whereas the same is probably true in reverse. It's probably best on both sides not to read too much into things. We have to remember that even if we shared the language completely we can still never read intent online much of the time..
I wasn't to know you didn't know much about youtube, I should have perhaps guessed, in hindsight because you called it a public forum.. but it's not like I am an expert. The story goes that with the 2nd ever accident, I was asked to upload it onto YT by the insurance company... and with the 3rd accident, I just did it automatically and shared it with the insurance company.
I'm not angry. I told you I didn't know why you used the word 'disappoint', it seemed to have come from left field*, simple as that.
Writing online does not always properly convey the tone, pitch or mood being expressed. We've probably just misunderstood each other's intent based on that.
*I believe the phrase 'left field' may be an Americanism. ~
Mad is acceptable usage too, it means something a little different to angry. It is actually an American term when it's used as an alternative to angry. If you look at what I said, I didn't *say* you were angry.. I did highlight that you had used the word, *that* and the emphasis therein could well, as I said, indicate you were disgruntled.. This was exactly what I was explaining that it's possible that due to a slight shift in the way we use language things can be interpreted differently.. What you guys see as direct can be seen as aggressive and perhaps vice versa. I also admitted that in reality we can't always read intent when all we have is words. It's easy to misread. So, to clarify.. lol... I think I am saying I agree with you :P
I shall look it up...... Very cute. What was your parrot trying to open? I heard your son's music, also. Very good.
This post was edited by Element 99 at June 27, 2018 8:29 PM MDT
Adaydreambeliever 