Active Now

Malizz
Spunky
Discussion » Questions » Current Events and News » If humans absolutely HAD TO have a microchip embedded somewhere under the skin, which functions do you think it should serve? ~

If humans absolutely HAD TO have a microchip embedded somewhere under the skin, which functions do you think it should serve? ~

Posted - July 17, 2018

Responses


  • 9777
    To alert the police about anyone violating a restraining order that you have filed against them.
      July 17, 2018 6:05 AM MDT
    2

  • 52903

      That's a good one, TRULY good. I like it. Violating laws and statutes should never be taken lightly, and those who do it should be held accountable to the fullest extent possible. (Say, how about you and I getting together later this evening to discuss this over a quiet dinner and a nightcap?  Sevenish.)


    ~
      July 17, 2018 6:25 AM MDT
    1

  • 9777
    Well, it might be a good way to see if these microchips work.
      July 17, 2018 7:52 PM MDT
    1

  • 52903

      SHE ACCEPTED, FOLKS!  SHE WANTS ME, SHE WANTS ME!
      July 17, 2018 8:04 PM MDT
    0

  • 5391
    Tracking your location, compiling records of others who are frequently near you, and locations you visit by frequency.

    Not that I endorse these functions, but inevitably, they would be involved, whether we want them or not.  This post was edited by Don Barzini at July 17, 2018 7:54 PM MDT
      July 17, 2018 6:52 AM MDT
    1

  • 1305


    Consumerism

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qVPcladS_0k


    It's already happening with facial recognition no need for chips.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AmHCIz6_c4Q


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XJfN_PQMvUc

    And police who already have facial recognition.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0JupZy4LJ50&spfreload=10






      July 17, 2018 11:51 AM MDT
    0

  • 32527
    Tracking, advertising, on chip banking, forced behavior...pain pleasure rewards/punishment. 
      July 21, 2018 6:38 AM MDT
    0