Active Now

Danilo_G
Discussion » Questions » Language » Considering the following, is it any wonder that Randy D and I are so busy with all of you and your posts?

Considering the following, is it any wonder that Randy D and I are so busy with all of you and your posts?

WHY ENGLISH IS SO HARD

We’ll begin with a box, and the plural is boxes,
But the plural of ox should be oxen, not oxes.
Then one fowl is goose, but two are called geese,
Yet the plural of moose should never be meese.

You may find a lone mouse or a whole lot of mice,
But the plural of house is houses, not hice.
If the plural of man is always called men,
Why shouldn’t the plural of pan be called pen?

The cow in the plural may be cows or kine,
But the plural of vow is vows, not vine.
And I speak of a foot, and you show me your feet,
But I give you a boot — would a pair be called beet?

If one is a tooth and a whole set are teeth,
Why shouldn’t the plural of booth be called beeth?
Then one may be that, and three may be those,
Yet the plural of hat would never be hose.
We speak of a brother and also of brethren,
But though we say mother, we never say methren.
So our English, I think you will agree,
Is the trickiest language you ever did see.

Posted - September 23, 2018

Responses


  • "N-U-M-B!!"

    This post was edited by Benedict Arnold at September 27, 2018 1:29 AM MDT
      September 23, 2018 1:32 PM MDT
    5

  • 22907
    :)
    :)

    " . . . this is 'go' and 'do.' "

    :)


      September 26, 2018 7:39 PM MDT
    1

  • 22891
    no, that dont surprise nne
      September 23, 2018 1:43 PM MDT
    2

  • 13257
    *doesn't
      September 23, 2018 2:30 PM MDT
    4

  • 44229
    That sounds like a George Carlin skit.
      September 23, 2018 2:47 PM MDT
    3

  • 4631
    I heard that one when I was a kid at school, and periodically since then quoted by various wordsmiths.

    Most people imagine that the plurals of English words should work according to one constant rule, but they don't.
    Our language has collected words from many other languages,
    and so the plural of each word is the same as for that language. 
    Sometimes based on the sound, we mistake the origin of a word and thus give it the wrong plural.

    Kine is archaic and almost obsolete. It comes from the Middle English, kyne, kyn, kuin, kiin, or kien  for “cows”. 
    The exact lineage is uncertain; it is either a double plural of Middle English ky, kye (“cows”),
    or inherited from Old English cȳna (“cows', of cows”), genitive plural of cū (“cow”). (Oxford etymological dictionary.)




    This post was edited by inky at September 26, 2018 7:33 PM MDT
      September 23, 2018 3:11 PM MDT
    2

  • 17398
    I like this a lot.  I have many friends in European countries.  We talk about this stuff frequently.  
      September 23, 2018 9:56 PM MDT
    4

  • 22907
    After ALF's fun Gallagher's video, I hope you can have time to listen to Brian Regan's skit. Regan is a favorite comedian of mine.
    :)

    This post was edited by WelbyQuentin at September 27, 2018 1:26 AM MDT
      September 26, 2018 7:40 PM MDT
    2

  • 13257
    LOL!
      September 26, 2018 7:51 PM MDT
    1

  • 22907
    Ha!
    :)
    Me, too!
      September 26, 2018 8:02 PM MDT
    0