Discussion»Questions»Death and Dying» Why is it in most all countries you get imprisoned for killing someone and yet when governments go to war no one that kills gets prosecuted
This isn’t true. Believe it or not, there are rules in war. Killing combatants, someone on the other side who is aiming to kill you and your mates, is not illegal in war.
War crimes are a real thing, in fact, we can examine the Nuremberg trials of 1945-46 where Nazis (the ones who hadn’t yet killed themselves) were convicted and hanged. In this current time, there is word that the POTUS is considering pardoning convicted war criminals here in the US, just in time to disgrace Memorial Day.
Do you think for instance that every German man that was forced or conscripted to go fight a war that they themselves were against had any choice but to go and kill on someone else's say so... What makes killing legal and or illegal ....
Americans centuries ago went to war with the Indians of the Americas just to steal their land and minerials ,England rap'ed the world for centuries before..... Why is it right to kill if you're powerful and wrong if you are weak ? England wanted to wipe out the entire aborigin population of Austraila ,just to steal their country..
I always thought that the victor gets to write the rule books...
England stole part of Ireland many years ago.....our government still wonder why the southern Irish get upset when we refuse to return it to its rightful owners....is that legal or illegal ?
A key to waging war is to convince the masses that a war is necessary, or desirable, or just. Achieve that and the carnage is imminent. Right is subjective.
In the case of Germans in WWII, I believe they were thoroughly convinced of the righteousness of their cause, at least for a while. They were misled by a powerful message to join the movement. I would say to you that there is a point of no return.
It is the victors who claim the spoils, rule the conquered and write the history. I wish we could count how many wars were fought just for those things.
Yes, through propaganda and desperation over the depression (Germany hit particularly hard with years of sanctions) many kinda looked at a charismatic Hitler as a savior and the supposed righteousness of His cause. Apparently antisemitism was already common as well.
https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/the-great-depression The Great Depression also played a role in the emergence of Adolf Hitler as a viable political leader in Germany. Deteriorating economic conditions in Germany in the 1930s created an angry, frightened, and financially struggling populace open to more extreme political systems, including fascism and communism.
https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/the-nazi-rise-to-power During 1930–1933, the mood in Germany was grim. The worldwide economic depression had hit the country hard, and millions of people were out of work. The unemployed were joined by millions of others who linked the Depression to Germany's national humiliation after defeat in World War 1. Many Germans perceived the parliamentary government coalition as weak and unable to alleviate the economic crisis. Widespread economic misery, fear, and perception of worse times to come, as well as anger and impatience with the apparent failure of the government to manage the crisis, offered fertile ground for the rise of Adolf Hitler and his Nazi Party.
I can’t imagine any case in which war is OK. It isn’t OK to kill other people, but war is the ultimate insanity. Is it right (or sane) to want to kill someone who merely stole from you? I’d say no.
This post was edited by Don Barzini at May 28, 2019 2:09 AM MDT
Was it not right for the US to fight for and win its independence from England with the state of affairs in the colonies? And was it not right for the Allies to fight and subdue Germany, liberate the concentration camps, and bring the Nazi war criminals to justice at Nuremberg? Of course it was.
Was it right for the English and other European countries to steal America from the Indians that already lived there ...All nations take/ took what they wanted back then and no care about what was right or wrong... Might is right and it's still those with the most powerful weapons that rule the world.... What happens next in the world when a nuclear country out grows its land mass .....Will it then want or need to take land from its neighbours... .?
Sorry, but when a country and its leaders commit genocide, such as Germany with Hitler and the Nazis, then normal bets are off and its enemies become justified in taking necessary action.
What about Airel Sharon killing men ,women ,childred and babies when he was a general in the Isreals Army and what it's still doing to the Palestine now.....They take what ever land they want from people unable to defend themselves and the whole world just sits and watches...... All wars are about oil ,minerals and money .... No one fights over and land that is barren and worthless.
Hitler was nasty ....Winston Churchill had dealings with Concentration camps during the Boar War....He was part of killing men ,women and children held in concentration camps in Africa but no one ever prosecuted him for his war crimes... Im sure most of the German solders never wanted to fight and kill as they were made to... The English executed most of the conscientious objectors that didn't want to fight and kill during the first and second world wars.... Who has the right to do that . .?
Im not saying he didn't....Do you feel the same way about the German soldiers that were forced to do it as well...Soldiers that disobey orders in wars get shot on both sides for cowardice and disobeying orders alike....
Its not a contest.....was Airel Sharon not as guilty because he killed less....Should he not suffer the same fate ... Is his crime not worse ,you can't condem one man and and than let off another ....
If a judge condems a person to death for an horrific murder and then has to preside over his own child's fate for committing the same crime, should the sentences be different or the same....?
Depends on which side of the conflict you are fighting for, Stu. Personally, I think these battles were necessary, and inevitable. But “right” is subjective.
Did King George III and his Redcoats think the American Revolution was “right”? I seriously doubt it. Did Hitler and the Nazis think they were right? You can bet they did. Were the Allies right in incinerating Dresden? There are compelling arguments on both sides. I would point out to you that the Allies were generally unaware of the Nazi concentration camps until near the end of the war. Of course it was right to liberate them, but is it fair to wonder if it would have expedited the Allied invasion had they known about the Holocaust sooner?
This post was edited by Don Barzini at July 28, 2019 9:43 AM MDT
Not all homicides are crimes. However, all killings of humans are included in the homicide definition.
Without dealing with the question as to whether a just war is possible any longer, there are various examples of legal, state or other legally sponsored homicides---including executions and self defense.
I think we all have a right to defend ourselves,depending on the crime and how much force was used...Crimes against money seem to get much harsher sentences then voilent crimes....
War is filled with crimes it seems. Even though many are recorded not all are ever prosecuted. It's not a subject in which I am very well informed, but for an American, this article is pretty horrifying.
There is so much to read that it's impossible to take it al in... I'm sure the allies in all wars commits exactly the same thing when they overrun towns and cities....who knows what state of mind soldiers end up with that have witnessed friends and colleagues blown to bits or dismembered.... Who can commet if you have not been there to witness it first hand....
True....hold those that send you there to blame then.... It would be far far better for just our leaders to fight it out ...I'm sure that would stop all wars in their tracks...:)
You have a great point because then there would be no war if the cowardly masters of war were to be on the front lines.
"Masters Of War"
Come you masters of war You that build all the guns You that build the death planes You that build all the bombs You that hide behind walls You that hide behind desks I just want you to know I can see through your masks
You that never done nothin' But build to destroy You play with my world Like it's your little toy You put a gun in my hand And you hide from my eyes And you turn and run farther When the fast bullets fly
Like Judas of old You lie and deceive A world war can be won You want me to believe But I see through your eyes And I see through your brain Like I see through the water That runs down my drain
You fasten all the triggers For the others to fire Then you set back and watch When the death count gets higher You hide in your mansion' As young people's blood Flows out of their bodies And is buried in the mud
You've thrown the worst fear That can ever be hurled Fear to bring children Into the world For threatening my baby Unborn and unnamed You ain't worth the blood That runs in your veins
How much do I know To talk out of turn You might say that I'm young You might say I'm unlearned But there's one thing I know Though I'm younger than you That even Jesus would never Forgive what you do
Let me ask you one question Is your money that good Will it buy you forgiveness Do you think that it could I think you will find When your death takes its toll All the money you made Will never buy back your soul
And I hope that you die And your death'll come soon I will follow your casket In the pale afternoon And I'll watch while you're lowered Down to your deathbed And I'll stand over your grave 'Til I'm sure that you're dead