Active Now

Slartibartfast
Randy D
Discussion » Questions » Current Events and News » Why is hearsay allowed for "whistleblowing" and "impeachment" but not in any court in America?

Why is hearsay allowed for "whistleblowing" and "impeachment" but not in any court in America?

Posted - September 27, 2019

Responses


  • 34239
    If that is the case, the President Trump will be removed from office. God wins....if not the we see that ICIG is not working on God's behalf. 
      September 29, 2019 6:56 AM MDT
    0

  • 7280
    Invalid syllogism and conclusion.

    The Senate members still have the free will that God grants and Satan rejoices in.

    (Did you see the picture of Senator Lindsey Graham that Steve Colbert had on his show the other night?---It showed Graham's reaction when Graham discovered what Satan actually offered to pay Graham for his worthless soul.) 
      September 29, 2019 3:17 PM MDT
    0

  • And obviously neither are you.
      September 28, 2019 8:47 PM MDT
    2

  • 34239
    Of course I am not God. I have never claimed anything of the sort. 
      September 29, 2019 6:52 AM MDT
    0

  • 5391
    Tell you what, M2C, keep on repeating that and watch how much difference it makes to anyone.

    You haven‘t learned a blessed thing. 
      September 28, 2019 3:38 PM MDT
    1

  • 7280
    The only requirement that a whistleblower needs is to have seen or heard something that he thinks should be investigated by someone in charge.

    There is absolutely no requirement that it not be hearsay.

    A whistleblower (also written as whistle-blower or whistle blower) is a person who exposes any kind of information or activity that is deemed illegal, unethical, or not correct within an organization that is either private or public.
      October 31, 2019 12:26 PM MDT
    0

  • 34239
    Yawn
      October 31, 2019 7:48 PM MDT
    0

  • 7280
    Please respect the members and cover your mouth when you yawn.
      November 1, 2019 3:44 PM MDT
    0

  • 7280
    Then the topic itself must be judged as inappropriate.  It's like asking why grapes can be green, black, etc., when they are ripe, but bananas are yellow when ripe.
      September 28, 2019 2:41 PM MDT
    2

  • 34239
    No...the question was about in general why was hearsay being allowed in a whistleblower report. 
      September 28, 2019 2:45 PM MDT
    0

  • 7280
    It doesn't happen all that frequently; but when I don't understand something, I usually say so because, well, it's just easier in the long run..
      September 28, 2019 2:47 PM MDT
    1

  • 7280
    I think there is the possibility that the distance between reach and grasp approaches infinity.
      September 28, 2019 2:43 PM MDT
    0

  • 5391
    Indeed. Particularly when they are extending in opposite directions, at different speeds, and the latter is completely oblivious to the former.  
    Lol This post was edited by Don Barzini at September 29, 2019 3:07 PM MDT
      September 28, 2019 3:42 PM MDT
    2

  • 7280
    ---and I totally forgot to consider the retrograde component of the issue.

    lol This post was edited by tom jackson at September 29, 2019 3:10 PM MDT
      September 29, 2019 3:09 PM MDT
    1

  • 2836
    How did the American People find out about Clintons BJ?

    Oh..that's right. Linda Tripp. Hearsay

     
      October 30, 2019 4:53 PM MDT
    2

  • 34239
    Tripp had taped recording of Monica talking about Clinton's abuse of power (affair with an unpaid intern). As long as the taping legal (DC has the one party consent law when it comes to recording) and the voice can be proven to be the person claimed....then it is not considered hearsay. So as soon as it was proven it was Monica's voice on the tape....it became real evidence and not hearsay. This post was edited by my2cents at October 31, 2019 8:09 PM MDT
      October 31, 2019 8:08 PM MDT
    0

  • 2836
    Sooooooooo  heresay.

    If she had a video of that little whore on her knees that's one thing.

    total heresay
      November 1, 2019 2:58 PM MDT
    0

  • 34239
    No not hearsay....read again. 
      November 1, 2019 3:04 PM MDT
    0

  • 7280
    Because neither impeachment nor whistleblowing involve any kind of court---a whistleblower has the same rights as any other person to state what he heard, and those empowered to investigate the accusations made by the whistleblower are also free to do so.  

    If the Senate winds up holding a conviction "trial," then Trump will have the typical rights a defendant has "in any court in America."

    And simply put, impeachment does not have to be for a crime.

    And Hamilton made it clear that an impeachable (in and by the House) or convictable (conviction and removal from office by the Senate) offense need not be a crime.

    Hamilton said impeachment applied to 'the misconduct of public men.'







    This post was edited by tom jackson at November 1, 2019 4:17 PM MDT
      November 1, 2019 4:17 PM MDT
    0