Would the Republican party be able to find anybody among themselves that is suitable at all?
In American politics, the Southern strategy was a Republican Party electoral strategy to increase political support among white voters in the South by appealing to racism against African Americans.[1][2][3] As the civil rights movement and dismantling of Jim Crow laws in the 1950s and 1960s visibly deepened existing racial tensions in much of the Southern United States, Republican politicians such as presidential candidate Richard Nixon and Senator Barry Goldwater developed strategies that successfully contributed to the political realignment of many white, conservative voters in the South who had traditionally supported the Democratic Party rather than the Republican Party. It also helped to push the Republican Party much more to the right.[4]
The "Southern Strategy" refers primarily to "top down" narratives of the political realignment of the South which suggest that Republican leaders consciously appealed to many white Southerners' racial grievances in order to gain their support.[5] This top-down narrative of the Southern Strategy is generally believed to be the primary force that transformed Southern politics following the civil rights era.[6][7] This view has been questioned by historians such as Matthew Lassiter, Kevin M. Kruse and Joseph Crespino, who have presented an alternative, "bottom up" narrative, which Lassiter has called the "suburban strategy". This narrative recognizes the centrality of racial backlash to the political realignment of the South,[8] but suggests that this backlash took the form of a defense of de facto segregation in the suburbs rather than overt resistance to racial integration and that the story of this backlash is a national rather than a strictly Southern one.[9][10][11][12]
The perception that the Republican Party had served as the "vehicle of white supremacy in the South", particularly during the Goldwater campaign and the presidential elections of 1968 and 1972, made it difficult for the Republican Party to win back the support of black voters in the South in later years.[4] In 2005, Republican National Committee chairman Ken Mehlman formally apologized to the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), a national civil rights organization, for exploiting racial polarization to win elections and ignoring the black vote.[13][14]
That supposition presents such a sea change in the fundamental culture of the American South, that is almost difficult to imagine. The Republican Party has long reflected and relied upon the deeply entrenched, faith-biased politics of southern voters.
When we see bloviating nutcases like Pat Robertson, who has built a tremendous personal fortune shilling his god nonsense, proclaiming this President “is God’s man for the job”, while continuing his crusade of denigration against all things secular, science and LGTBQ (in violation of the very commandments he has defended being displayed on public property), we see a microcosm of the fallacies and dangers of these politics.
As one who grew up in the south, I am continually saddened (and amused) by the manifest ignorance of the people here. The overt racism, the mass acquiescence to the fables of religion and false narratives of the defeated Confederacy, and abiding complacency of the electorate are facts of life that must be confronted by any candidate hoping to gain support here.
That said, any atheist, given a choice would be more concerned with governing policy and reasoning than personal ideology and whether a candidate prayed or not, how often, or to whom. How this would not translate to better focused, more job-qualified nominees and a govt more consistent with the vision of the Founding Fathers, is difficult to argue.
WM BARR . =ABSOLUTE TRASH 