Active Now

Danilo_G
Discussion » Questions » Politics » Don't you agree that many problems would be eliminated if we required the PRESIDENT to have an IQ of 130 as a limit? Even Nixon's was 132.

Don't you agree that many problems would be eliminated if we required the PRESIDENT to have an IQ of 130 as a limit? Even Nixon's was 132.

Trump would CHEAT and have his IQ blown sky high anyway.  .....

Nevermind.

WHITE HOUSE

Trump fixates on IQ as a measure of self-worth

People who know Trump suspect his IQ obsession stems in part from a desire to project an image of success, despite scattered business failings and allegations of incompetence.

 

It was January 2004 and Donald Trump was on the “Today Show” to promote a new reality TV series called “The Apprentice.”

Almost immediately after the interview began, Trump started bragging about the unparalleled intellect of the contestants who would compete for a job at one of his companies.

“These are 16 brilliant people. I mean, they have close to 200 IQs, all of them,” he told host Matt Lauer. “And some may be beautiful and some may not be beautiful. But everybody has an incredible brain.”

It wasn’t the first time Trump fixated on IQ as a measure of a person’s worth — or, as is frequently the case, worthlessness. And it wouldn’t be the last. Fifteen years later, Trump, now president of the United States, still uses IQ as a shorthand for intelligence, dividing the people in his orbit into winners and losers.

In private, according to interviews with a half-dozen people close to him, Trump frequently asserts that people he likes have genius-level IQs. At various points during his presidency, he’s told aides that Lockheed Martin CEO Marillyn Hewson and Apple CEO Tim Cook are high-IQ individuals, for example, former White House officials said. Trump has also dubbed himself a “very stable genius” on multiple occasions.

And the president is quick to accuse his political enemies of having low IQs, as he did when he repeated North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un’s criticism of former Vice President Joe Biden, one of his leading Democratic challengers.

“I was actually sticking up for Sleepy Joe Biden while on foreign soil. Kim Jong Un called him a ‘low IQ idiot,’ and many other things, whereas I related the quote of Chairman Kim as a much softer ‘low IQ individual,’” Trump said Tuesday after the Biden campaign criticized him for tweeting during his trip to Japan that he smiled when Kim insulted Biden’s intelligence

While the exact reason for Trump’s IQ obsession is difficult to nail down, people who know him suspect it stems in part from his desire to project an image of success and competence, despite scattered business failings and repeated allegations from critics that he’s incompetent. Trump is also known for being thin-skinned. He often fires back at anyone who criticizes him with a barrage of insults, while simultaneously building himself up.

“I don’t think you have to put him on the couch to see that someone who has such a consistent need to build himself up and belittle everyone else must have some problems with self-esteem,” said Trump biographer Gwenda Blair, who wrote a book about the Trump family. “It’s a lifelong theme for him.”

“Part of it comes from his insecurities about not being perceived as intelligent,” a former White House official added.

In recent years, Trump has accused Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.), actor Robert De NiroWashington Post staffers, former President George W. Bush, comedian Jon Stewart, Republican strategist Rick Wilson, MSNBC host Mika Brzezinski, and Rick Perry, now his Energy secretary, of having low IQs.

Posted - November 9, 2019

Responses


  • 19937
    I would like to think you mean an IQ of 130 as a minimum not as a cap.  If 130 was the cap, Trump definitely fits the bill.
      November 9, 2019 8:50 AM MST
    1

  • 16791
    Nixon was very smart. Evil, but clever. George W was dumb as a brick. I actually prefer that.
      November 9, 2019 8:57 AM MST
    1

  • 5391

    I would be no less pleased if there was a cap on how many pending lawsuits a candidate is allowed (Trump had 75); and/or summary disqualification on evidence of personal or professional conflicts of interest (shall we count the ones we know of?)

    It would also be useful to require some measurable experience in government. 

    This post was edited by Don Barzini at November 9, 2019 9:28 AM MST
      November 9, 2019 9:18 AM MST
    1

  • 19937
    I couldn't agree more.  However, Trump has used the legal system throughout his entire adult life to thwart those whom he doesn't want to pay for work they were hired to do.  It is his tactic to stall payment in the hopes that the person on the other end will get tired of spending money on attorneys and either agree to a negotiated settlement or give up entirely.  Trump is not an honorable man.  
      November 9, 2019 9:21 AM MST
    1

  • 5391

    Quite the understatement.  

    If only there were a way to measure and assess honorability. 

      November 9, 2019 9:31 AM MST
    1

  • 19937
    Well, considering all the dishonorable things we knew about Trump before he even decided to run, that should have been a no-brainer.
      November 9, 2019 10:56 AM MST
    1

  • 7792
    Many problems would be eliminated if each candidate went through a battery of psychological evaluations.
      November 9, 2019 10:58 AM MST
    1