Active Now

my2cents
Shuhak
Discussion » Questions » Politics » US Attny Gen. Loretta Lynch had a meeting with former Pres Clinton in private.

US Attny Gen. Loretta Lynch had a meeting with former Pres Clinton in private.

Former President Clinton had a private off the record meeting with AG Lynch.

Is it not a little strange that the former president and the AG would be in the same place at the same time in Arizona and have a 30 minute meeting while the AG is investigating his wife and could be a witness in this investigation?

The meeting was not recorded.

Posted - June 30, 2016

Responses


  • 3907

    Hello d:

    OMG!

    excon

      June 30, 2016 6:33 AM MDT
    0

  • 17261
    Conspiracy, eh?

    Do you follow every move of former presidents and their meetings?
      June 30, 2016 7:32 AM MDT
    0

  • 500

    No but Good Morning America was.

    The AG will be looking for a job after the next election.

    Maybe a job interview. Just slow down the investigation till after the election and you keep your job if Hilary wins.

    If she looses then we hire you at the Clinton Foundation.

      June 30, 2016 7:37 AM MDT
    0

  • 17261
    Sure, you got it all covered. That was why they made their meeting so "secret" no one would ever find out about it. Tsk tsk.
      June 30, 2016 7:40 AM MDT
    0

  • 3907

    Hello deaves:

    My sources tell me it was the other way around..  He met to offer a plea deal for Hillary..  Bill said she can do TWO years in the slam, but Lynch wants FIVE..

    excon

      June 30, 2016 7:42 AM MDT
    0

  • 2515
    Whaaat? Don't we live in a free country?
      June 30, 2016 7:45 AM MDT
    0

  • 46117

    It sounds like you are very restricted in your thinking.  Maybe you need to breathe a little.  Whatever was said?  SO WHAT?  What are you thinking?  Clinton had to run to Arizona and have a face- to- face for what?  So he can stuff some  money in her  shirt pocket or something?   Maybe they are carrying on some improper love affair!!!  Make stuff up.  You and the Usual Suspects are great for this.

    I don't think so.  I don't care.   And guess what?  No one will ever know.  So you can make things up all you want to.  Maybe he is doing a Monica Lewinsky on her.  Why don't you spread that one around?

    Image and video hosting by TinyPic

      June 30, 2016 7:56 AM MDT
    0

  • 34270
    Sounds like there could be a conflict of interest. They should have recorded it to avoid such allegations.
      June 30, 2016 8:04 AM MDT
    0

  • 17596

    Nothing the Clintons do is above board.  You know that.    The fact is that for Billy to be in a private meeting with the AG when a decision about his wife's possible indictment  is in the balance is wrong.  My money says.........................well,, you can guess what my money says.   This is how the _____ (use your own name for it) operates.

      June 30, 2016 9:00 AM MDT
    0

  • 17596

    There are some parties who should not meet in private.  The husband of a suspect awaiting news of indictment has no business meeting in private with the AG (prosecutor).  It's the AG whose integrity, and maybe license, could be in jeopardy.  That in the real world.  This is Obama's administration so the rules about transparency, forthrightness, and integrity do not exist. 

      June 30, 2016 9:03 AM MDT
    0

  • 17596

    And if you don't accept either one, ...........................................................

      June 30, 2016 9:05 AM MDT
    0

  • 13277

    And? If Mrs.Clinton was to be indicted, it would have already happened.

      June 30, 2016 10:46 AM MDT
    0

  • 500

    Not when protected by Obama and the democrat party. Lynch works for Obama. Her job depends on keeping the boss happy.

      June 30, 2016 10:48 AM MDT
    0

  • 17261
    Keep spinning, I see you got the script all ready...even without knowing anything but insinuating. Must be good knowing about everything. Can I have the short version about the Trump UNIVERSITY fraud and try to undermine the justice system by the GOP PC?
      June 30, 2016 11:09 AM MDT
    0

  • 3934

    I guess since the BENGHAZI!(tm) hearings turned up nothing after several years and $7 million, this is the sort of thing you're reduced to in order to reinforce your STOOPID EBIL LIBRUHLZ IS STOOPID...AND EBIL! clarion call for your fellow Usual Suspects.

    It's kinda pathetic, don't you think?

      June 30, 2016 11:17 AM MDT
    0

  • 46117

    Yes, let's be VERY paranoid that always helps. What if they use the same bathroom?

      June 30, 2016 11:20 AM MDT
    0

  • 46117

    Capron, you have redeemed yourself handsomely.

      June 30, 2016 11:21 AM MDT
    0

  • 1113

    Whoaaa, a private, off the record meeting was NOT RECORDED! Call the FBI!

      June 30, 2016 11:51 AM MDT
    0

  • 13277

    So if she's not going to be indicted, then what's the point of your question? If it's that you dislike President Obama, you can vote to elect Mr. Trump or Mrs. Clinton in 4 months and he'll be out of office in 7 months.

      June 30, 2016 12:10 PM MDT
    0

  • 2500

    "Free" country?

    Apparently April 15th doesn't affect you? Or you're on the other side of that "equation"?

      June 30, 2016 12:16 PM MDT
    0

  • 2500

    Purely a coincidence (wink, wink, nudge, nudge).

    He was probably just checking with her to see if she knew if Bruce was "post-op" yet; wanting to line up a "date".

      June 30, 2016 12:18 PM MDT
    0

  • 13277

    Look in the mirror. The paranoid nutjob you see might be you!

      June 30, 2016 12:29 PM MDT
    0

  • 3934

    I may start using that graphic....;-D...

      June 30, 2016 2:32 PM MDT
    0

  • 1113

    They are still citizens with a right to privacy.

      June 30, 2016 2:36 PM MDT
    0