AnswerMug
  • Sign In
  • Sign Up
  • Help

Sign In

 
 
 
 
Connect with Facebook
 
Sign-in with Twitter

Create Account

You will use your email address to login and you will need to click on a link in an email before your account can be activated.

Passwords must be at least 6 characters in length.

Enter your password again for confirmation.

 
 
Menu
  • Questions
  • Polls
  • Blogs
  • Groups

Q&A Search

 
 
 

Trending Ten

  • Is growing up in Northeast Massachusetts the insanest thing?
    1
  • Well, there's plenty of time in the future for this?
    2
  • Have you used AI to help with anything serious?
    3
  • When was the last time you were pulled over by the police? Did you get a ticket?
    4
  • What is that you’re hiding behind you, and why don’t you want me to see it?
    2
  • What is a cultural reference that you simply DO NOT understand? (Either your own culture or someone else’s.) ~
    3
  • Have the detailed pixeled credits decharged from medium voltage fruit loops, graham crackers my Screaming Yellow Zonkers, Doritos, S'more's?
    1
  • What are some good and valid reasons that Randy D might not (or wouldn’t) let you in?
    10
  • Urine floating around the cabin? So yeah, unglamorous work, six hours in, Christina Koch plays space plumber, while Mission Control dawdles?
    1
  • 2-part question: What is something that you keep changing, and what is something that keeps changing you?
    4

Search Results

  • Stewart Rhodes jailed for 18 years for sedition. How does this affect His Royal Orangeness?

    Surely this scuttles his campaign? Even if he manages to weasel his way out of being convicted himself for Jan 6, calling the Oath Keepers "good people" is undeniably offering comf...  moreSurely this scuttles his campaign? Even if he manages to weasel his way out of being convicted himself for Jan 6, calling the Oath Keepers "good people" is undeniably offering comfort - so he's constitutionally ineligible to hold office! Or am I misreading Section III of the Fourteenth Amendment?  
    Last post by my2cents - May 30, 2023
    1,471 views 1 like
    22
  • What does "jurisdiction" mean in the 14th Amendment?

    The first sentence of the 14th Amendment reads: "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United Stat...  moreThe first sentence of the 14th Amendment reads: "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside."...The question about whether or not a child born in the US is automatically a citizen, comes down to the meaning of "jurisdiction". Are foreigners "subject to the jurisdiction" of the United States, just by being IN the United States (or its territory)?...The legal definition of jurisdiction is "the authority given by law to a court to try cases and rule on legal matters within a particular geographic area and/or over certain types of legal cases." According to this definition, if foreigners are NOT subject to the jurisdiction of the US then American police could not arrest them - and they could not be tried in American courts. This is the protection foreign diplomats get with "diplomatic immunity". If every foreigner had this protection, there would be no need for a special exemption for diplo...    less
    Last post by Walt O'Reagun - November 2, 2018
    1,379 views 2 likes
    18

Image of a burning sage smudge stick

 

Copyright ©2026  -  Privacy  -  Terms of Service  -  FAQs  -  Photo Guidelines  -  Contact Admin  -  RSS
 
Answerbag Refugees - Experience Project Refugees - About answerMug Adult - Join answerMug Adult (Muggers Only)
Share