Is the coronavirus nature's response to global warming?

I don't think so.

The zootic viruses are present in wild and domestic livestock irrespective of climate change.

Sustained average warmer temperatures do challenge the immunity of some species, such as bats.
So when humans handle the animals in wet markets, there might be a higher probability of transmissions from sick animals -- but that's only a guess.

But diseases in general could become more prevalent due to climate change.
At places like the South Pole, it's too cold for bacteria to multiply easily,
while in the tropics many diseases spread with incredible ease.

No.
Two conditions of unrelated origin, but occurring simultaneously, and brought on and exacerbated by an overabundance of humans. 

I'm going with no.

No....It's just natures way of trying to bug us all for our own greed and stupidity :( 

No.  I think pandemics are nature's way of culling the population so the earth can sustain those remaining.  Otherwise, starvation would be rampant.

No, I don't think they are related.. The reverse may be true... that the increase in frequency and ease of travel means people are more mobile, which increased transmission.. So, less travel would cause less global warming and decreased likelihood of pandemics.

What a stupid question and anybody who has a bummer police insignia on his logo is some kind of bad anyways!