Active Now

Element 99
DannyPetti
Discussion » Questions » Politics » What's an example of a positive way your government spends your tax money?

What's an example of a positive way your government spends your tax money?

~

Posted - October 13, 2016

Responses


  • 3907
    Hello Randy:

    Sometimes they actually FIX pot holes.

    excon
      October 13, 2016 7:05 AM MDT
    1

  • 44623
    They DO...I want to live where you live.
      October 13, 2016 7:09 AM MDT
    0

  • 46117
    and bust innocents who smoke it
      October 14, 2016 7:47 AM MDT
    0

  • 3907
    Hello T:

    Yeah, even though it's LEGAL here, the cop mentality is to hassle people who have pot in their pocket..  Have I mentioned that I'm NOT fond of the gendarmes? 

    excon
      October 14, 2016 7:51 AM MDT
    0

  • The National Health Service.
     
      October 13, 2016 7:09 AM MDT
    1

  • 53509
    That's it; I'm moving to England. I've heard too many good things about the NHS.  (Prepare some space for me in your spare bedroom, ok?)
    ~
      October 13, 2016 3:28 PM MDT
    1

  • Oh such luxury. The scullery room for you!
      October 13, 2016 11:00 PM MDT
    1

  • 53509
    Hey, wait a minute . . .
    ~
      October 14, 2016 7:42 AM MDT
    0

  • 44623
    They are giving me back MY social security money. Now...to answer your question...The National Parks Service. This post was edited by Element 99 at October 13, 2016 3:32 PM MDT
      October 13, 2016 7:10 AM MDT
    1

  • All kinds of things.  Roads, sewers, trains, agriculture, schools, hospitals, dentists, pensions, unemployment benefits, sickness benefits, etc, etc.

    Lists are quite boring things and I've lost interest in this one already.  It goes on for quite a while though.
      October 13, 2016 7:13 AM MDT
    2

  • Sewers? Are we living in the same country Mr W?
      October 13, 2016 10:19 AM MDT
    1

  • Why yes, we are Lucia. :)  

    The maintenance of sewers is the responsibility of whoever owns the road they sit under.  This is referred to as 'adopted' roadways/sewers.  If 'adopted' then it's the government's responsibility to pay for it's upkeep.  This usually means local councils foot the bill.  

    If it's 'unadopted' then the owner of the property facing the sewer has responsibility and gets to pay for maintenance.
      October 13, 2016 12:42 PM MDT
    1

  • (Strange how, since the privatisation of the water companies, more and more sewers and drains have become 'unadopted', but I don't want to rant about the follies of de-nationalisation).
    Dentists are contentious too, but anyway.
    The waterways! The only nationalised infrastructure left. This post was edited by Benedict Arnold at October 13, 2016 11:18 PM MDT
      October 13, 2016 11:12 PM MDT
    0

  • The truly magnificent thing about privatisation is that one can often manage to privatise the profits and socialise the losses.  Which means that even though the railways (for example) are 'privately' owned, they are still recipients of bundles of public cash given by government.  

    The Great Lie (privatisation is good for everyone) told in the '80s is still running and still costing the taxpayer money.  The simple fact is that services cost money and they'll cost a private company money just the same as if they were publicly owned.

    Now I want to find someone with a suit and a rosette and break their legs at the knee joint......  :(
      October 14, 2016 4:59 AM MDT
    0

  • Extremely erudite of you, Mr W. Even the leg-breaking bit.
    The Great Lie indeed. Great comment!

      October 14, 2016 5:04 AM MDT
    0

  • 2500
    Well, there's all the ATF (Jet A) used in Air Force II for the "First Lady" to follow Air Force One a couple of days later . . .no, that doesn't benefit the taxpayers. But then there's all the money that gets spent on Congressional perks . . . no, that has no benefit to the taxpayers. But there's all the money spent on studies like the sex habits of the aldebrian sea sponge . . . maybe that's not a good example either. So, I've got nothing . . .
      October 13, 2016 11:29 PM MDT
    1

  • 53509
    (Er, um, do you have the website for the sea sponge studies?  I'm asking for a friend, and for purely scientific interests, of course.)
    ~
      October 14, 2016 7:45 AM MDT
    0

  • 46117
    They positively take as much as they can every year out of my pocketbook.

    This post was edited by WM BARR . =ABSOLUTE TRASH at October 15, 2016 3:48 PM MDT
      October 14, 2016 7:50 AM MDT
    1

  • 22891
    foodstamps and medicaid
      October 16, 2016 9:37 PM MDT
    1