Witness hacks GA Sen election in real time. Testifies to GA election commitee about it. Are dominoes beginning to fall?

They also issued a order for the ballots counted in the middle the night after observers sent home to be examined by Mr Pulitzer (this is the man who holds the patent on CRQ  QR codes) he will examine the paper ballots and will know if they were mailed, printed on the correct printer, if ballots were filled by a human or a printer, if multiple ballots were filled in by the same human.  He says he can do this in less than one day. 

This post was edited by my2cents at December 31, 2020 2:03 PM MST

Mr J.H.Pulitzer seems to be the right man to do the testing.

Mr. Pulitzer should get a prize.

Give him m2c for a prize.

...If they find 'massive fraud' that is. This post was edited by Kittigate at December 31, 2020 6:36 AM MST

LOL ... she can have him one way or the other.

No such luck...I am not going anywhere. :)

"Denso Wave and Masahiro Hara invented the QR code in 1994," and Denso holds several patents on the invention.  

https://www.nippon.com/en/news/fnn20191214001/the-little-known-story-of-the-birth-of-the-qr-code.html

Sorry I misheard. It is CRQ that he hold patents.  
https://q-code.org/history-of-scan-commerce/

He was in...he proved he could hack into it.  No he did not actually change any votes etc...that was not his purpose. The purpose was to show he could.

But being able to hack in proves they were compromised. 
These are the machines that are "not" even connected to the internet. So it is "impossible" to hack into...this are the lies they have been telling us for years. 

Get rid of the computers. We cannot have a secure election using them. This post was edited by my2cents at December 31, 2020 8:13 AM MST

Once again, you're misunderstanding what he said.  He said the system COULD be hacked.  He did not say that it WAS hacked which proves nothing.

No you misunderstand. He was in the system...he hacked into it. 
"Right now at this very moment. We are in..."  He is talking about the computers currently being used for the GA Sen election.  He hacked them. Showing them to be compromised. 

For heaven sake - he did not say others hacked them.  He said HE hacked them and unless he's admitting to hacking and hijacking votes, nothing else has been proven.  How many other ways can I say this for you to understand?

There is a difference between something being hackable and something actually having been hacked. This post was edited by SpunkySenior at December 31, 2020 4:19 PM MST

He hacked them. 
The point is it can be done. These are systems that they claim to secure. Never connected to the internet. He proved they are connected to the internet and they are not secure. 
This is proof the computer systems need to be audited.  We cannot know until that happens. 

You keep repeating the same thing over and over.  His being able to hack the computers does not mean that anyone else did - only that they CAN be hacked and that is not proof.  And now, I'm done.  I am not ending my year discussing this with someone who doesn't want to see the truth.  Happy New Year.