Discussion»Questions»Politics» So voters, poll workers, election security, voting machines, media, attorney general, justice department, FBI, and courts can't be trusted.
Not all states are in question. Just the ones who stopped counting in the middle of the night (GA resumed counting with no observers after lying about a water main leak). And states where they refused to allow proper observers as required by law. And even after court orders still did not comply.
These are the states were workers and observers reported fraudulent activities.
No I do not trust computers....computers do what they are programmed to do.
Yes when 105K of 113K ballots have to be adjudicated...this means you machines failed.
When ballots do not have barcodes and different aligment marks based on being a Dem or Rep area....yes I question it.
I think Donald got his ideas about questioning election results from what's been going on in Bella Russe and Russia. There, the people have very good reason to distrust the electoral processes of communist dictatorships.
The USA has totally different systems - many counter balances and means of checking veracity, and a two centuries old culture of acceptance of democracy. These things mean that if ever there are irregularities, they'll be on such a small scale as to make no difference to the overall outcome.
His Royal Orangeness is panicking. He's up for the limit when he exits the WH and knows it. There is ABSOLUTELY NO EVIDENCE of widespread fraud, none. A few minor irregularities, as happens in every single election (and could well of handed GWB victory in 2000), but given that Biden won the popular vote by more than 7 million votes (and a huge percentage of those were not particularly pro-Joe, just anti-Donald), even the implicit gerrymander built into the system by the ridiculous "winner-takes-all" method of selecting College electors couldn't save him.