Why do you complicate it so much?
~
Whenever we won’t wear what we would want, would we wish we weren’t walking weirdly without wandering within wide, wondrous woolen warehouses walruses?
~
Whoa, whoa. What we wore when we were wee won’t work when we watch wife waltz. Why we whoop when we watch weird wild women wax.
Well, what would we want with wet waters while winning worthy worthlessness with wicket widgets wholly withheld when warbling waddlers wiggle wishful whiskers?
~
Well, well, we’ll. Wired, wrapped, whipped, wrought. We want war, what’s what? When waging war wordwise, why wait with wanton will? Wise ways warrant wiser waywardness, which will wind westwardly with wistful winds, while weaknesses wear wane “warriors”.
~
Why?
~
Rife with typographical errors; disqualified!
~
I tried to let you off with just a warning, but no, that’s not good enough for you, you had to shoot off your mouth. Fine, if that’s the way you want it, let’s just get out the old citation book. Grrrrrrrr.
(Will Walters Walter’s wife . . . ) Apostrophe neglect.
(W wrathful wench!) The last sentence has ending punctuation, therefore, this is a new sentence and should start with a capital letter, even though it is in parentheses.
(Which wide wrinkled widow was watching Waler Walter wash?
(weird Weird!) The last sentence has ending punctuation, therefore, this is a new sentence and should start with a capital letter, even though it is in parentheses.
Tell it to the judge, pal.
~
This is Randy D you’re dealing with here: spelling and punctuation ALWAYS count! Grrrrrr.
~