What kind of candy would Donald J Trump be?

A patriotic popcycle that just had a fascist type of melt down on Truth Social. As well as reposting a very ignorant post. The repost featured images of Vice President Harris and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and the words: “Funny how blowjobs impacted both of their careers differently.”

 

This post was edited by Nanoose at August 29, 2024 6:08 AM MDT

Typical low-class comment from Herr Trump.

Trump is trying to get the woman's vote. But he shares an ignorant post that suggests woman can only get to the top by sexual favors. So who is really the dum dum? Cheers and happy weekend!

No one said only way.  Just some womens way. 

I personally, think it will be a sad day if Kamala gets in and that is what young girls have to look up to. When wondering what they need to do to further their careers.  Whether it is true or not, it is part of her backstory. So many women who could be our 1st female President who do not have that allegation in their backstory.

Hillary,  Haley, Michelle Obama,  Lake, Duckworth,  and so many others who unquestionably got their positions through hard work. This post was edited by my2cents at August 29, 2024 8:33 AM MDT

I'm sorry, this may sound hostile, which isn't how I intend it, but I don't think young boys (or girls) should look up to Trump's backstory instead.

I agree, Trump was a sleazy playboy. I would not want my sons to follow in his personal footsteps. And his sleazy acts were not allegedly to advance his career.
AND he is not the first  _______ President as Kamala would be the First female President,  the first Indian-Jamaican President. 

What difference does it make if Harris is the first female president, the first India-Jamaican president or the first anything else president?  For a woman, you seem to be a misogynist, maybe even a racist, something I find extremely offensive.  

Will she not be the First.....President?  Will she not be the one to break that glass ceiling that other failed to do? Will it not be mentioned ad nauseum if she were to win?   
That is not racist nor misogynistic it is simply a fact of what will happen.  And future girls looking to further their careers may unfortunately think this it the route they may have to take.  Just as some think posing in Playgirl/boy (I don't know which is which) or starring in a porno or sex tape is the way to fame and future. (Kardashians/Paris Hilton etc)

The problem is that you never mention those "firsts" in a positive manner.  They are always attached to something negative.  So she had an affair with someone well before she was married - so what?????  Why do you jump to the conclusion that the affair was the reason she achieved what she did?  In that vein, let's go with more firsts:  Trump is the first convicted felon president.  An let's not forget E. Jean Carroll and what he was convicted of there.  Trump is the first president to continually, and without a shred of evidence, attempt to overturn the results of an election.  Trump is the first president to institute an insurrection.  Trump would be the first president to pardon the January 6th insurrectionists.  Clearly, yin your eyes, those aren't severe enough "firsts" to consider him unworthy of holding the highest office in the land.  I feel sorry for you.

Not convicted in the E Carole that was a civil suite and it was deflamation of character.  Lawfare....he will be the First to stand up against it and not run away.   Yes, some othe Jan 6ers should be pardoned.  

I don't think it will be good for Kamala to be the first....I listed some others of both parties who I think it would be a good First Female President.  

Again POLICIES are what I vote on...the rest is just "candy" for people to chew on but really does not matter. 

My being a woman and not supporting a woman simply because she is a woman or a non white woman does not make me racist nor misogynistic, it makes me a realist. Women are not a monolithic voting block and we should not be. Nor should any other demographic.  

Thank you. Personally, I think character is the most important quality in a leader. If you can't be trusted by your partner, by your business associates, by your creditors or your clients, you cannot be considered trustworthy by your constituents. 

I guess if you follow Kamala's strategy of not telling your constituents your policies, you cannot be accused of being untrustworthy. 

She has been out on the campaign trail, talking about her policies. Just because she hasn't personally called you, doesn't mean they don't exist.

She has flip flopped on everything from the border wall to fracking, to the taxes on tips, to the ev mandate (EPA regulated emissions ....a bill she helped write)  etc and she has no policies on her site to where constituents would know which is her actual current policy position.  

And refuses to do a solo interview with even friendly media. 

You can continue this discussion without my participation. 

So we finally get to policies and now we are done???

She is having a televised interview tonight and she will talk about her polices. And by tomorrow Trump will be looking like this because her poll numbers will go up and his will go down. Cheers and happy weekend! 

Yes an interview she cannot even do solo on a friendly network.  Pretty sad in my opinion.  

'Whether it is true or not'??!! So, all we have to do is start an unsubstantiated story and that disqualifies a woman from running for office? It is completely sexist to vilify women for having a personal life while excusing male candidates for openly immoral behavior.

The people involved do not dispute that there was a intimate relationship between them. The question is whether the relationship was the reason for the political appointments.  

So, as long as there is a question, we can disregard her education and accomplishments, smear her reputation and call her unfit for office. Got it.