Discussion » Questions » Current Events and News » Another political assassination. Can people just stop killing people over political disagreements?

Another political assassination. Can people just stop killing people over political disagreements?

This one killed Charlie Kirk. 

Posted - September 10

Responses


  • 12007
    In my lifetime,  just off the top of my head: JFK, RFK, MLK, Malcom X, Harvey Milk, Melissa Hortman and John Hoffman were killed. Attempts were made on George Wallace, Gerald Ford (twice), Ronald Reagan, Donald Trump. I don't know who I might have left off the list and there were others before my time (Lincoln, for one).

    I wish it didn't happen, but I don't have a lot of hope that it will change.
      September 10, 2025 8:12 PM MDT
    3

  • 24174
    Agreed.
      September 11, 2025 6:36 AM MDT
    2

  • 4818
    The irony is that the conservative activist had just begun debating someone about mass shootings and gun violence.  Condolences to his family.
      September 11, 2025 7:03 AM MDT
    0

  • 12007
    And yet...
      September 11, 2025 7:05 AM MDT
    2

  • 4818
    Then his children shall one day honor the fact that their father died so they could keep their Second Amendment rights.  I'm sure that will be comforting to them.

    Edited typos This post was edited by Spunky at September 17, 2025 1:22 PM MDT
      September 11, 2025 3:06 PM MDT
    1

  • 35647
    It is believed by some that was the cue question for the shooter. 

    Evil...people doing evil things. 
      September 11, 2025 10:05 AM MDT
    0

  • 4818
    I always say, "Be careful what you wish for."  I wonder if he would have felt the same way had his wife or one of his children been gunned down.  It's pretty easy to discount someone else's life.
      September 11, 2025 7:11 AM MDT
    2

  • 12007
    To be clear, I don't think gun control (which I am in favor of), will solve political violence. I have seen assassinations and attempted assassinations my whole life. It is not a new phenomenon in this political climate. I really don't know how we stop it.
      September 11, 2025 7:52 AM MDT
    2

  • 4818
    Well, we may never be able to completely end political violence, but gun control could possibly lower the number of attacks.  Gun control could certainly go a long way towards these school shooting and mass shootings.  
      September 11, 2025 8:50 AM MDT
    1

  • 12007
    True. I have been mulling over things that might help. Perhaps if schools taught critical thinking skills it would mean fewer radical nutjobs and conspiracy theorists. Perhaps teaching kids how to solve conflicts without violence or how to discuss issues and be able to learn from the discussion. I'm not talking about brainwashing kids, but rather equipping them with the skills to navigate life and coexist in relative peace. 
      September 11, 2025 9:08 AM MDT
    1

  • 4818
    Those are all good ideas.  However, growing up in the age of the Internet has been detrimental in many ways for kids now.  Some kids will do anything for "likes."  Others will do anything for notoriety and with the internet going 24/7, news gets around in moments.  
      September 11, 2025 9:25 AM MDT
    1

  • 35647
    Ironically,  teaching people to discuss their political disagreements was what Kirk did....

    I remember being taught in school: "I may not agree with what you say but I will defend to the death your right to say it."  That is not what is being taught today. 

    There is a difference, no businesses needed to board up, there were no riots, no cities burnt. We held prayer meetings, candlelight vigils etc but we are fighting back (not physically) ...and people who were stupid enough to post online their joy at a murder, are being fired and that is a good thing. People need to be reminded that that is unacceptable behavior
    . This post was edited by my2cents at September 12, 2025 8:33 AM MDT
      September 11, 2025 12:43 PM MDT
    0

  • 11999

    Well I don’t think we know if it was a political assassination yet. But the Trump team is already throwing out the red meat that will probably brew more political violence – so it will never stop.

     

    In the wake of Charlie Kirk’s killing on Wednesday, right-wing commentators and activists pledged to avenge the act of violence and called for payback in explicit statements blaming the left.
    Cheers!

      September 11, 2025 8:59 AM MDT
    1

  • 12007
      September 11, 2025 9:01 AM MDT
    2

  • 35647
    You are wrong. We cared, we called for the arrest. 
    Trump responded appropriately and gave more support to MN to find the shooter.  


    We support violent people being jailed/imprisoned/etc. Regardless of the party of the victim. We want a safe Amercia for everyone. 
      September 11, 2025 10:48 AM MDT
    0

  • 12007
    I stand corrected. Trump  (or likely his staff) issued a generic statement on X and allowed the standard (not extra) FBI assistance to be deployed. He responded live to reporters questions on the shooting - videos below.   I believe that was his final comment. His concern and compassion truly touched my heart. [Sarcasm] 

    This post was edited by Jane S at September 11, 2025 12:23 PM MDT
      September 11, 2025 12:03 PM MDT
    0

  • 35647
    I don't care that he did not call Walz.

    They got the shooter, so they got the support they needed. And he will be going to prison or worse (I would give worse) but that will be up to a judge. 

    And they will get the murderer of Kirk as well. 
      September 11, 2025 12:36 PM MDT
    0

  • 12007
    So Trump responded for these two Democrats, the same way he responded for Kirk, in your opinion? He didn't actively stop the FBI from doing the job they were supposed to do, so that's enough? There has been way more political violence aimed at the left and Trump is largely indifferent. 

    I edited to remove a link to an article on trumps despicable rhetoric.  This post was edited by Jane S at September 11, 2025 2:14 PM MDT
      September 11, 2025 2:05 PM MDT
    0

  • 35647
    We have differing opinions as to more violence or less towards each side of the aisle.  (No surprise there)

    No, Kirk is known to him personally. And a nationally known figure.  Of course, there was a stronger response to a person who he knew personally.   As it would be with anyone....

    That said he condemned both murderers. And thinks they violent murderers belong in prison (at minimum) 

    Not like some online and in the media etc who are literally celebrating a murder.  Some of those have already lost jobs etc over it.  
    This post was edited by my2cents at September 11, 2025 3:41 PM MDT
      September 11, 2025 3:36 PM MDT
    0

  • 12007
    I agree with that quote from Charlie Kirk.. Trump is using this death as another opportunity to demonize the Democratic party as are many other high ranking Republicans. Current and former Democratic officials have been respectful and non-political in their messages. 

    I have seen truly disturbing posts from the right including calls to declare the Democratic party a terrorist organization and all arrest Democratic leaders. So don't think all the nutjobs are only on one side. There is a difference between private citizens and elected officials , especially the president who makes no effort to bring the country together.
      
    My opinion of left vs right political violence is based on actual statistics, which I'm sure you won't find in the right-wing echo chamber where you get your news

    That's it for me, make the final comment, you know you can't resist. I doubt anyone will read it.
      September 11, 2025 5:51 PM MDT
    2

  • 35647
    The Dem party is the one celebrating a murder. And claiming it was his fault.  Rep Omar has not made respectful or non political comments. Neither have some in the media.   

    Politicians calling for violence in 2025:
     
    House Minority Leader @hakeemjeffries, D-N.Y., is being criticized by Republicans after pledging Democrats would fight President Donald Trump’s agenda ‘in the streets.’” – @Foxnews 1/31/25.
    “‘I think that you punch, I think you punch, I think you OK with punching… It’s Ted Cruz,’ (@RepJasmine Crockett) went on. ‘I mean, like this dude has to be knocked over the head, like hard, right?'” – @nypost 3/25/25.
    “‘Maybe it’s time for us to be a little meaner,‘ @GovTimWalz said to audience … ‘Maybe it’s time for us to be a little more fierce because we have to ferociously push back on this.'” – @nypost 6/16/25
    “‘Well, who cares about the f***ing rules right now? Punch back, kick back, dunk over their heads and win some f***ing power!’ @BetoORourke said.” – @dcexaminer 8/13/25
    “@GavinNewsom has threatened to ‘punch’ Donald Trump in the mouth” – @thedailybeast 8/20/25
      September 11, 2025 7:17 PM MDT
    0

  • 4818
    You think it's only Democrats who are using more violent language?  Here are a few points made by a group of political scietists regarding the increasing volatility in Trump's speeches.  As the president, he holds a much larger pulpit than any other single politician. 

    "Donald Trump’s political career has been marked by a unique and often controversial rhetorical style. Since 2015, his rhetoric has evolved significantly, attracting attention for its direct, often violent tone."

    We are political scientists who analyzed Trump’s campaign and presidential speeches from 2015 through 2024. We found that one of the most striking trends in Trump’s rhetoric is the sharp rise in his use of violent vocabulary. The share of words associated with violence rose from almost 0.6% in 2016 to 1.6% in 2024 in Trump’s speeches. 

    By 2024, Trump’s use of violent language had surpassed that of nearly all other democratic politicians we considered, approximating that of authoritarian figures such as Kim Jong Un and Fidel Castro.

    Once in office, however, his speeches exhibited a more combative style. His use of violent language surged, and references to “them” became more frequent.

    This evolution suggests that Trump’s rhetoric is adaptable, changing in response to political contexts and the audience he aims to engage. His increasing use of inflammatory language and swear words after taking office contrasts with the more measured tone he adopted during his 2016 campaign.

    https://theconversation.com/we-analyzed-9-years-of-trump-political-speeches-and-his-violent-rhetoric-has-increased-dramatically-238962

    Edited for typo
    This post was edited by Spunky at September 14, 2025 4:54 PM MDT
      September 12, 2025 6:40 AM MDT
    2

  • 35647
    Trump has not called on people to harm politicians.   Your article does not give one example of their claim. The one closest example they gave was the "it will be a bloodbath" comment which was about the car economy not any form of physical violence.

    I gave recent examples of Dem Policians calling for violence against politicians.  And there are more....
      September 12, 2025 8:26 AM MDT
    0

  • 4818
    No, Trump doesn't call for violence ahainst any specific politicians.  His rhetoric encompases entire groups of people.  

    “For years, those on the radical left have compared wonderful Americans like Charlie to Nazis and the world’s worst mass murderers and criminals,” Mr. Trump said. “This kind of rhetoric is directly responsible for the terrorism that we’re seeing in our country today, and it must stop right now.”

    Missing from Mr. Trump’s list was any reference to political violence targeting Democrats or perpetuated by those on the right."

    https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/11/us/politics/political-violence-trump-blame.html

    "In a Thursday op-ed for Common Dreams, author and journalist Christopher D. Cook laments how “Kirk had barely been declared dead when President Trump hideously used his killing to falsely blame and attack the left.”

    The president, writes Cook, “seized the moment of widespread mourning to spread more hatred and division, in a reckless, angry televised speech that hurled blame at the left despite not a scintilla of evidence about Kirk’s assassin or their politics.”

    https://www.commondreams.org/news/charlie-kirk-and-trump

      September 12, 2025 9:24 AM MDT
    1