Discussion » Questions » Politics » Some religions are based on TAX laws rather than RELIGION. Is that good, or abominable?? Why?

Some religions are based on TAX laws rather than RELIGION. Is that good, or abominable?? Why?

Posted - January 8, 2017

Responses


  • 6124
    Okay excon.  I'll bite.

    Bottom line, if a religion is started simply to make use of our tax codes, it is unethical which, by my standards, is abominable.  Why? Because the non-profit status given to religious organizations exempts them from paying taxes.   Which means the rest of us are left shouldering their responsibility. 




      January 8, 2017 9:10 AM MST
    0

  • 3907
    Hello Harry:

    If you find the practice abominable, then it can be eliminated simply by removing the religious exemption.  But, as long as the government is PRECLUDED from deciding what a religion IS or what it ISN'T, SOME people might establish a church based upon, oh I dunno, maybe the teachings of Popeye..  Legend has it that HE is the author of, "I yam what I yam, and that's all that I yam".  Wow. That's kinda profound.  They might even call it the Eye of The Pope Church, and make themselves a Monsignor.

    But, I don't know anybody who would DO that..  Do you??

    excon
      January 8, 2017 9:28 AM MST
    0

  • 6124
    Yes, my old boss would if he had thought of it first.

    Staying in the vein of the teachings of Popeye, have you heard of the Church of Euthanasia? The guy who started it was having some fun but then decided to apply for non-profit status.  And he has it. 

    The Church of Scientology, Joel Osteen, and all his predecessors such as Jimmy Swaggart, Ted Haggard, & Jim Bakker.  I don't know about the Church of Euthanasia but I'm sure you know that the others have/had amassed a great deal of wealth at one time or another.  Without that sweet tax benefit, the head of Scientology & Joel Osteen wouldn't be living in the lap of luxury as they are now.

    BTW, you seem to be confusing the Constitution with the IRS tax code.  The code can (and should!) be adjusted.  I do think all religious groups should not be allowed to apply for & receive non-profit status.   But, I know it's not going to happen.  Maybe if I tweet out to the Great Pumpkin elect he might look into it.   I'm sure he would do something about it.  After all, he is all about helping the little guy.  Right?  Right?


      January 8, 2017 10:37 AM MST
    0

  • 13277
    That depends on how you define religion.
      January 8, 2017 11:47 AM MST
    0

  • 3907
    Hello Stu:

    What does, "how you define it", mean??  Is it MY definition that counts, or the government's?  What if I say my religion is centered around roses.  Should THAT give me a religious tax exemption? 

    excon This post was edited by excon at January 8, 2017 4:44 PM MST
      January 8, 2017 4:44 PM MST
    0

  • It's business. I'm surprised that somebody using a name like Ex Con would find it unusual that the moguls of the religion industry would try to maximise their profits. :D 
      January 8, 2017 1:48 PM MST
    0

  • 3907
    Hello D:

    I'm not surprised nor do I find these practices unusual.  I'm reporting these facts to see if YOU find it surprising or unusual..

    excon
      January 8, 2017 4:36 PM MST
    0

  • 22891
    depends on what theyre doing
      January 8, 2017 3:43 PM MST
    0

  • 3907
    Hello P:

    They use the "church" for tax advantages..  For example, they can call their house a rectory, and not pay any property taxes on it..

    excon
      January 8, 2017 4:31 PM MST
    1