Active Now

Element 99
Shuhak
Discussion » Questions » Politics » What do you think about parents using young children* in political and/or civil protests?

What do you think about parents using young children* in political and/or civil protests?

*Newborns to eight years old, for instance.

Posted - January 18, 2018

Responses


  • 17599
    Shame on them.
      January 18, 2018 11:11 PM MST
    2

  • 16790
    Like the Westboro Baptists? Matthew 18:6 says it better than I can. This post was edited by Slartibartfast at January 19, 2018 7:27 AM MST
      January 19, 2018 7:26 AM MST
    0

  • 7939
    I think we talked about this once before when a bunch of parents took their kids out to a Phoenix protest with a police presence. It was a dangerous situation, and I was really disappointed in those parents. 

    Yours question reads a little differently. You said "using." Using how? As fodder? As human shields? 

    I believe every parent should teach their children civic responsibility. When Target was in the public eye for kicking out a breastfeeding mother, moms everywhere did nursing sit-ins. I was all for that. It was a peaceful and safe demonstration. There have been marches here for women, gay rights, religion, and other things. I know parents who have taken their kids to those- one father I know took his young daughters to the women's march. I thought it was a beautiful and empowering gesture. It was a safe environment and an experience that will stick with those girls for life. 

    But, not all protests and demonstrations are safe environments. If something is very politically-charged or could be risky for the child, parents should keep their kids out of it. 
      January 19, 2018 3:05 PM MST
    0

  • 53509


    The most recent one shown on the local news spurned me to post this question.  Schoolteachers were at a school board meeting protesting issues surrounding their salaries.  Many parents were there, and some children were also.  The ones that made the evening news appeared to be of the age of Kindergartners, first and second graders, they were shown with microphones shoved in their faces to give their "perspectives" on the situation.  It wasn't played up for comic effect, either; the "reporters" were seeking intellectually-inspired comments from these cherubs.
    ~
      January 19, 2018 10:30 PM MST
    1

  • 7939
    :/ No, that's not right. 

    I can understand parents lobbying for teachers to have better salaries, and, to a certain extent, I could understand bringing a child along if no other caregiver is available... Eh... Even that doesn't sit well with me. It's almost like a divorced/ divorcing couple sitting their kid in the room while they discuss child support. The child really shouldn't be involved in those things. I would think that a small child would see him/ herself as a burden on the teacher- kids that age really can't split out the political aspect of it. 

    Is that along the lines of what you were thinking or were you somewhere else with it? 
      January 19, 2018 11:06 PM MST
    1

  • 53509


      A five-year-old doesn't know anything about salary tables, tenure, human resource-related topics, retirement eligibility, annuities, tax deferral regulations, etc. What I saw in the news was one child after another repeated the rehearsed lines that had been fed to them by adults. 

    ~
      January 19, 2018 11:19 PM MST
    1

  • 7939
    Yes, there's that too, if you want to be all sensible about it. ;)
      January 19, 2018 11:28 PM MST
    1

  • 1326
    I think it insane to put a child's safety at stake. It is the parent's responsibility to ensure the safety of their children. 
      January 24, 2018 12:04 AM MST
    0