Discussion » Questions » Legal » What kind of new law do you think is needed in the U.S.?

What kind of new law do you think is needed in the U.S.?

Posted - January 14, 2019

Responses


  • Politician  salaries, benefits & term limits shall be decided by the popular vote of the people every 2 years. 

    Men shall no longer be allowed to wear man-buns, cargo pants, or flip flops.  (flip flops ok at beach, park or similar location only)

    Don't speak English?  That's fine, no driver's license for you.


    This post was edited by Benedict Arnold at January 15, 2019 7:50 AM MST
      January 14, 2019 5:41 PM MST
    5

  • 44603
    It's OK for women to wear flip-flops?
      January 14, 2019 6:37 PM MST
    3

  • If they groom their feet properly.  No corn chip toe nails shall be exposed.  lol
      January 14, 2019 6:56 PM MST
    2

  • 19937
    No.  And there should be an application for permission to wear sandals - men and women.
      January 14, 2019 9:31 PM MST
    1

  • Hahah, that's right!
      January 14, 2019 9:33 PM MST
    1

  • 19937
    One of the things that bothers me the most is that people - men and women - who wear sandals, flip clops or any other open backed shoe don't seem to wash the bottoms of their feet.  Other than gnarly toes, nothing uglier than seeing the dirty soles of someone's feet.
      January 15, 2019 11:27 AM MST
    2

  • Indeed.  It used to people would generally clean up a little before going out in public.  
      January 15, 2019 11:38 AM MST
    1

  • 44603
    The president should have an IQ over 80.
    Lobbyists should be banned from DC.
    All welfare recipients should be neutered.
      January 14, 2019 6:41 PM MST
    5

  • I love that neutered welfare recipient law idea. I was thinking the same thing.
      January 14, 2019 6:58 PM MST
    1

  • 16763
    Neutering is too extreme. I was on welfare for a few years due to a crippling back problem. Post-surgery, I'm a productive taxpaying member of society again.
      January 14, 2019 7:09 PM MST
    4

  • 19937
    You are exactly the kind of person for which welfare was meant.  It was never meant to be a person's forever income unless there is a disability involved.
      January 14, 2019 9:34 PM MST
    2

  • 19937
    I'll go along up to neutering welfare recipients.  There are occasions when a family is forced to go on welfare, but manages to get themselves on the right path.  Welfare should be available for a period of five years only - not necessarily concurrent, but in total.  People without disabilities should have to find work and if they cannot earn sufficient money to keep body and soul together, they would get a subsidy.
      January 14, 2019 9:33 PM MST
    2

  • 976
    It may already exist but, there should be some way to prevent the amount of food wasted by restaurants and grocery stores. Those are the main places that come to mind. 

    Hibachi restaurants give such large portions there is no way one can eat it and it gets thrown away. Grocery Stores throw food away as soon as they expire. Such as vegetables. Those are two small examples. 

    So, a way to stop the amount of food wasted in the US?
      January 14, 2019 6:47 PM MST
    3

  • 44603
    The local Kroger stores here lock their dumpsters so people won't take expired food. Meat expirations are ridiculous as long as it is frozen.
      January 14, 2019 6:54 PM MST
    2

  • 16763
    Impose a maximum age as well as a minimum for Presidents. Say 70 - so no-one who has their 66th birthday prior to inauguration would be eligible to nominate. There's a minimum age of 35, there should be a maximum too. Senility, Alzheimer's disease and dementia are problems associated with ageing, Reagan clearly suffered throughout his second term and the current President shows signs as well.
    Enough refugees from the retirement home, let's get some energy in there.
      January 14, 2019 7:15 PM MST
    3

  • 19937
    I'd say 70 should be the last age at which someone could be nominated.  Today, 70 is relatively "young."
      January 14, 2019 9:38 PM MST
    2

  • Abolish the electoral college and let the popular vote determine the Presidential election!
      January 14, 2019 7:20 PM MST
    8

  • 19937
    Absolutely!  Also, eliminate campaign finance contributions from corporations.  Only individuals should be able to contribute to a campaign and only up to a maximum of let's say $25,000.

    EDIT:

    Actually, now that I think about it, even $25,000 is too much for one individual.  Campaign money should be distributed via a general fund taken from our taxes which would be distributed equally among the candidates.  Everyone should have a level playing field, not the person who has the most money. This post was edited by SpunkySenior at January 15, 2019 6:51 AM MST
      January 14, 2019 9:39 PM MST
    2

  • Absolutely Corporate campaign finance contributions should be outlawed!  
      January 14, 2019 9:56 PM MST
    4

  • 5835
    What are you, Californian or something?

    California Kicks Off 2019 with 1,016 New Laws
      January 15, 2019 12:09 AM MST
    2

  • 2052
    Wow! I had no idea. 
      January 15, 2019 7:51 AM MST
    0

  • 6098
    I don't think we need any new laws.  We have far, far too many already.  We need to start repealing them.  So that people will be more likely to take responsibility for their own destiny rather than blaming it on others. 
      January 15, 2019 5:51 AM MST
    1

  • 46117
    Integrity
      January 15, 2019 5:53 AM MST
    1

  • In the US, limit Presidential power!  That works when we have someone reasonable and sane in office, but it does not work when we have a King/dictator wannabee in that office.  
      January 15, 2019 7:35 AM MST
    1