HE IS SO HANDSOME. HE CANNOT BE GUILTY. HE IS NOT UGLY AND BROWN LIKE THAT BILL COSBY. HE IS NOT UGLY LIKE WOODY ALLEN. HE IS SO GOOD-LOOKING, ALL GIRLS OVER THE AGE OF 10 MUST LUST FOR HIM. HE IS BEAUTIFUL LIKE THAT INNOCENT, BLEACHED-SKINNED, VERY WEALTHY MICHAEL JACKSON WAS. AND JUST AS INNOCENT. LONG LIVE HIS NON-CHILDMOLESTING MEMORY.
You know what? I think there is another similarity. Both were murdered. And MJ is certainly guilty. I think you need to see the people who worked for him and what they have to say about it. OH MAN, it was BAD. Way worse than I thought. WAY WORSE.
I was kidding. I think he is a hideous ghoul. I can imagine him looking good from afar, he has a good look, tall, decent features, but as you get closer, he gets more ghoulish and if you are 17 and he is on top of you, I imagine it is a horror one will never forget.
I used to, a little, back when I was a sculptor. Just bought the works of fellow artists if I liked it well enough to hang on my own walls. Never for investment. There's a limit to how much wall and storage space a person has.
Curiously, when I moved to the country, I moved into a space so small that there was no room for art on the walls, only books. The art, which no longer stirs or moves me, gathers dust in storage in the garage.
Element 99 