A. Yes
B. No
c. I don't care
The question of “better” raises others.
What are the criteria for good?
Is context everything?
Could it be restricted to purely personal values or goals?
Is it better measured against the mores of human well-being,
or that of all life?
"Good" can refer to ethics, whatever causes the least harm and greatest benefit.
It best does so with unconditional and equal regard for both self and all other life.
In conflicts of interests, it can become a forced choice,
the moment when values and moral courage are most tested.
And the worst of it may be if one’s own values on some issue might conflict with the beliefs of others.
To be better might be as simple as devoting more time to volunteering in the local community.
It might be discovering how to be fully honest without hurting the feelings of others or causing harm.
It could mean learning patience and perseverance.
Perhaps its the need to let go of ego and greed,
or learn the balance between selfishness and self-care and respect.
But to be "good" or “better” can refer to just about any trait.
A person could become physically healthier, fitter, stronger, more agile,
could develop better emotional intelligence, communication and relationship skills,
could become better at work, creativity or at play,
or could devote more energy to volunteering in their local community.
This post was edited by inky at February 8, 2020 1:11 AM MST