Definitely crowds and no social distancing.
Wouldn’t it be cruel irony if a looter (NOT a protestor) contracted Corona Virus from another looter due to ignoring social distancing guidelines?
___
tests (plural) indicate
test (singular) indicates
I don’t think that’s accurate at all. Biden has his supporters just like many other politicians do. Just because you disagree with him or with his politics doesn’t mean that others see it the same way you do, and it certainly doesn’t mean his appearance won’t fill a venue. If you’re interested in being fair, that’s one thing. If you just want to express negativity and sling mud, that’s quite another.
You are just as entitled to any belief or opinion you chose as any other person is entitled to his or hers. To suggest that Biden has no excited supporters is outright silly. How do you define “excited”? If he has one “excited” supporter, doesn’t that make you wrong? There are over 325 million people in the US, and even if only one one-thousandth of them are “excited” Biden supporters, you’d be even more wrong.
Every single day, there are myriads of anti-Trump people who write or say wildly inaccurate things about him, some of them are outright lies. If and when that happens, it’s just as wrong as anyone writing or saying inaccurate things about Biden, or about any person in the world. Daily on this website, you defend Trump against many of the derogatory things that are written about him, and I’m merely addressing something derogatory and incorrect that you have now written about Biden. If you’re basing your lies on your dislike of someone, you don’t get a pass.
Lastly, and just for clarification, I am not pro-Biden, I am not even a Democrat nor a liberal. I am, however, attempting to be pro-truth, pro-maturity, pro-civility. All of this childish sniping and bickering over minutiae ignores more important, more salient and more pressing matters.
This post was edited by Randy D at June 3, 2020 3:38 PM MDT
What is the fact statement that defines an excited Biden supporter? Remember, you wrote that he has none of those.
[Prior ti to answering, you may want to brush up on the dictionary definitions of the words “fact”, “excited, and “none”.
Reread your first three words, “In my opinion”. Fact and opinion are not the same things. An opinion can either be supported by facts or not be supported by facts, yet it is still potentially valid either way. Fact, however, does not need opinion to support it in order to exist.
You brought up the word “excited” as some type of qualifier or descriptor of the noun supporter. Your explanation of what you meant by it is completely self-serving, completely opinion-based, which is fine, there is nothing wrong with you having an opinion. Even by your own opinion, Biden does in fact have excited supporters, thank you for making my pint for me while at the same time disproving yours. There are no more “measurable” facts in what you wrote than there are ovum in my anatomy.
So you want to split hairs over the word “none”? Nice dodge, but I’m not letting you off the hook that easily:
You wrote: “Yes he has supporters. But not excited supporters.”
Please don’t assume that you can maneuver around the English language better than I can.
The negation word you used, “not”, conveys the concept that your point is that he has no excited supporters, zero excited supporters, or that of excited supporters, he has NONE. So if you really want to dance that dance, you lose again, because you went back on yourself and wrote that he does not have as many as other politicians. That means that he has at least some, even as few as one. One is not the same as not having any. Some is not the same as not having any.
It might be a good idea for you to quit while you’re far behind, because you’re only digging yourself deeper with the more you write. There’s no shame in bowing out gracefully, but if that’s not attractive to you, be advised that I can go on ad nauseam.
officegirl 