The FBI is pursuing cases against 170 rioters who attacked the US Capital with more on the way.

Where to begin?

BLM denounced violence?
https://www.foxnews.com/us/chicago-black-lives-matter-looting-reparations-peaceful-protests-dismissed
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/12538173/blm-leader-threatens-burn-white-house-police-graves/
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2020/09/08/new-study-shows-majority-of-blm-protests-turned-violent-n2575801
https://truepundit.com/blm-riots-are-officially-the-most-costly-manmade-damage-to-american-property-in-history/

While some BLM leaders may have publicly denounced the riots, while most of the protests held around the country may have been peaceful, there is not deny the fact that they spawned a LOT of violence and destruction across the country

Those of us who support President Trump have been responsible for NONE of this.  Trump's rallies and the protests by those of us on the right have been peaceful.  The only time that there has been violence associated with these gatherings has been when the conservatives have been attacked by by left-wing counterprotestors.

Which Republicans support the KKK?  Which Republicans have come out and said that they agree with them?  There are not any.  The KKK has never been supported by the Republican party and the vast majority of us want nothing to do with them.  However, you leftist continue to push the lie that we agree with them.

It was ALL of the protesters at the rally last week that participated in the violence?  There are estimates that there were over 100,000 people at that rally.  They ALL stormed the Capital building?  From where do you get that?  The estimates are  that there were a few hundred to a few thousand that illegally entered the Capital.  Trump never told them to do so.  He told the attendees to PEACEFULLY protest.  Note, something here.  Not one of the people accusing Trump of insurrection is quoting his speech.  Why not?  Where did he tell people to assault the Capital?

You claim that it was an attack on our democratic government.  I agree.  Those who were guilty of the illegal behavior should be prosecuted.  However, what about last summer when Atifa laid siege to a federal court house in Portland, Oregan?  (And I note that you completely ignored Antifa in your response.)  Was that not an attack against our government?  What was the response of Democrats to that?  Nancy Pelosi called the federal law enforcement officers defending that court house stormtroopers.  One of her lieutenants did so as well.  Those who were defending the courthouse were blamed for the actions of the rioters.  That was not promoting insurrection?

What about when rioters laid siege to the White House and attempted to burn down Saint Johns Church in D.C.?  Was the attack on the White House, the center of the one branch of the government that is elected by the country as a whole, not an attack on our democratic government?  Once again, what was the response of the Democrats on this attack.  They lied about what happened there and denied that there was any violence.  They accused Trump of attacking peaceful protestors.

I could also bring into this discuss how it is that many leftist, Kamala Harris included raised money to pay for the bail and legal fees of the rioters.  You don't see any of us in the right doing that for those accused of attacking the Capital do you?

Funny, leftists spent most of the last four years telling us about how Russia helped to steal the election from Hillary.  There was never any evidence to support for this accusation.  All of the principal investigators into the so-called Trump-Russian collusion hoax were forced to admit that there was never any evidence of this when they were placed under oath and testified in secret.

The fact of the matter with this election is that the Constitution gives the authority for determining how electors are chosen exclusively to the state legislatures.  It does not give that authority to the executive branch nor the judicial branch.  It give that authority to the legislatures.  Over the last four years, Democrat operatives did end-runs around the legislatures by filing law suits to force changes in election laws through the courts.  They got executive branch officials to change election laws.  ALL of these changes were unconstitutional because they were not made by the legislatures.  Therefore, the votes in those states were not constitutional.

This is all before the hundreds and hundreds of sworn witnesses that testified of mishandled ballots.  It does not in crude the poll watchers who were forced to stand too far away from the counting to actually see what was happening.  It does not count the videos of ballots being smuggled into counting rooms and only being counted after the poll watcher were thrown out while being told that there would be no more counting that night.  There is lots of evidence of very questionable behavior in this last election despite what your propagandists in the media tell you.

After the 2000 elections, the press demanded the opportunity to investigate the elections in Florida.  They demanded to examine the ballots and do their own recount.  The Bush administration did not object to such an investigation.  Their examination of the ballots and recounts ultimately showed George W. Bush did win that election even with the most liberal standards the Gore was pushing to be used.  Given all of the evidence of irregularities in this election, why are none of the media interested in a similar investigation?  Why don't they want to prove that our suspicions are unfounded.  Could it be because they know that an honest investigation would show that the election was stolen?