and not just wander about aimlessly?
You might not have a valid citation here, Stu. In maritime jargon, either “into” or “in to” are interchangeable within the context of this particular usage point.
~
Wrong again, because certain professions and disciplines have internal jargon or parlance that doesn’t even have to align with mainstream norms. Case in point, and WITHOUT LOOKING IT UP IN ANY RESOURCE MANUAL OR REFERENCE WORK, what is your off-the-top-of-your-head ruling on which of the following sentences are grammatically incorrect?
1. Chief Petty Officer Smith served on board the USS Bass from 1970 to 1973.
2. Chief Petty Officer Smith served aboard the USS Bass from 1970 to 1973.
3. Chief Petty Officer Smith served in the USS Bass from 1970 to 1973.
4. Chief Petty Officer Smith was stationed on the USS Bass from 1970 to 1973.
5. Chief Petty Officer Smith was stationed in board the USS Bass from 1970 to 1973.
6. Chief Petty Officer Smith served in USS Bass from 1970 to 1973.
As a landlubber and a civilian, you might have an opinion about their stylization or structure, so let’s test you.
~
Lol.
Eye sea watt ewe did they’re
~
(glabal global)
Wanderlust, for instance. A person is on a journey with no particular destination or destinations in mind, just roaming around aimlessly seeking whatever devilment might be out there. (I tried that as my defense one time when I faced a civil court judge in Minneapolis at a restraining order hearing. It didn’t work.)
~