What specific felony law did Trump violate?

Thank you. I am well aware of my options.

More than one of us has answered your question - more than once.  You just don't want to accept the answer.

No you have not.....Bragg did not list in the indictment nor answer media questions as to the specific law, the misdeanor bookkeeping offense was supposed to be covering up. This post was edited by my2cents at April 8, 2023 5:52 AM MDT

From the Statement of Facts in the indictment:

"1. The defendant DONALD J. TRUMP repeatedly and fraudulently falsified New York business records to conceal criminal conduct that hid damaging information from the voting public during the 2016 presidential election.

2. From August 2015 to December 2017, the Defendant orchestrated a scheme with others to influence the 2016 presidential election by identifying and purchasing negative information about him to suppress its publication and benefit the Defendant’s electoral prospects. In order to execute the unlawful scheme, the participants violated election laws and made and caused false entries in the business records of various entities in New York. The participants also took steps that mischaracterized, for tax purposes, the true nature of the payments made in furtherance of the scheme.

3. One component of this scheme was that, at the Defendant’s request, a lawyer who then worked for the Trump Organization as Special Counsel to Defendant (“Lawyer A”), covertly paid $130,000 to an adult film actress shortly before the election to prevent her from publicizing a sexual encounter with the Defendant. Lawyer A made the $130,000 payment through a shell corporation he set up and funded at a bank in Manhattan. This payment was illegal, and Lawyer A has since pleaded guilty to making an illegal campaign contribution and 2 served time in prison. Further, false entries were made in New York business records to effectuate this payment, separate and apart from the New York business records used to conceal the payment.

4. After the election, the Defendant reimbursed Lawyer A for the illegal payment through a series of monthly checks, first from the Donald J. Trump Revocable Trust (the “Defendant’s Trust”)—a Trust created under the laws of New York which held the Trump Organization entity assets after the Defendant was elected President—and then from the Defendant’s bank account. Each check was processed by the Trump Organization, and each check was disguised as a payment for legal services rendered in a given month of 2017 pursuant to a retainer agreement. The payment records, kept and maintained by the Trump Organization, were false New York business records. In truth, there was no retainer agreement, and Lawyer A was not being paid for legal services rendered in 2017. The Defendant caused his entities’ business records to be falsified to disguise his and others’ criminal conduct."

"The indictment doesn't specify it because the law does not so require," 

What part of that do you not understand.  Bragg is not required to set forth proof in the indictment.

This post was edited by my2cents at April 8, 2023 3:46 PM MDT

Thank you. So as I have been stating Bragg does not specify what law was broken or was intented to be broken, aside from the normally misdeanor "falsification of business records".  This post was edited by my2cents at April 8, 2023 6:24 AM MDT

"illegal promotion of a political campaign"....what is that? See this is why he should be required to specify what law he is talking about.

§ 17–152. Conspiracy to promote or prevent election
Any two or more persons who conspire to promote or prevent the election of any person to a public office by unlawful means and which conspiracy is acted upon by one or more of the parties thereto, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.
(L.1976, c. 233, § 1.)

§ 17–166. Penalty
Any person convicted of a misdemeanor under this article shall for a first offense be punished by 
imprisonment for not more than one year, or by a fine of not less than one hundred dollars nor more than
five hundred dollars, or by both such fine and imprisonment. Any person who, having been convicted of a 
misdemeanor under this article, shall thereafter be convicted of another misdemeanor under this article, 
shall be guilty of a felony.
(L.1976, c. 233, § 1.)

It would appear that two people were paid to keep their mouths shut.  Should Trump be convicted of one such charge it would be a misdemeanor.  I he is convicted of both, it becomes a felony.

So should we arrest all of the intelligence officials who claimed the Hunter Biden labtop story was Russian disinformation? That most certainly affected an election.  

Stay on topic.  We aren't discussing Hunter Biden, but nice attempt to divert.

Lol. Same thing.  Different election.  And this one would not have statute of limitations issues.....

Not the same thing, no campaign contribution was involved.  It's more like when James Comey made a comment that cost Hillary Clinton the election. LOL

LOL