Active Now

Zack
Discussion » Questions » Politics » Got a “I told you so” to put in the bank for future use?

Got a “I told you so” to put in the bank for future use?

The White House said any suggestion that Trump is considering a 90-day pause on tariffs is fake news.

I think Trump will put a 90-day pause on tariffs. That way he can save face but still keep his – do as I say or I will tariff you powers.

So when that day comes (probably in less then 2 weeks) – I will be here saying – I told you so.

Cheers!

 

Posted - April 7

Responses


  • 17225
    I've been spending them freely since the inauguration.
      April 8, 2025 4:16 AM MDT
    1

  • 11560

    Today at the WH Trump met with Nayib Bukel the president of El Salvador. Bukel told Trump that he is not going to return Kilmar Abrego Garciato to the US and Trump seems fine about it.
    Seems a bit fishy to me. Trump can now say – it is out of his hands and EL Salvador might be exempt from tariffs in the near future. And if that happens I will be back here to say – I told you so. Cheers!

      April 14, 2025 2:53 PM MDT
    1

  • 17225
    That's ACTUALLY contempt of court and anybody else would already be in prison for it.
      April 14, 2025 6:23 PM MDT
    1

  • 11560

    During the WH meeting Trump and the president of El Salvador both said that Kilmar Abrego Garciato was a terrorist.
    There is no proof of that so I hope that Kilmar’s family sue Trump. Cheers!

      April 14, 2025 7:20 PM MDT
    1

  • 35244
    There is proof he is a gang member and that gang is now recognized as a terrorist group.  He is indeed a terrorist.
      April 17, 2025 5:05 AM MDT
    0

  • 11560

    I remember when Trump was in a felony trial – it was innocent until proven guilty. But now Trump say’s someone is a terrorist with no proof or trial and that person is automatically guilty.

    This post was edited by Nanoose at April 21, 2025 3:27 PM MDT
      April 17, 2025 9:08 AM MDT
    2

  • 35244
    Two separate courts have ruled that he is a gang member.  And during his immigration court, he asked for protection from deportation because he life would be endanger from a rival GANG. You cannot have a rival gang unless you are a gang member.   And the rival gang no longer exists.   But his gang does....so he is a member of a terrorist gang as ruled by 2 separate courts.  He had his day in court and he was found guilty of being a gang member.
      April 17, 2025 12:16 PM MDT
    0

  • 4439
    Which two courts ruled that he is a gang member?  

    Ask yourself this question:  If he is a gang member and has been adjudged guilty of something, why has the Trump administration ADMITTED that they wrongfully sent him to El Salvador?  
      April 17, 2025 2:45 PM MDT
    0

  • 35244
    Two courts in Maryland from a case in 2019. The one ruled it and the 2nd upheld it.
    There was an order not to deport to El Salavador  because of the possibility of rival gang retaliation. Garcia is a member of MS-13.  (That rival gang no long exists) So they should have been sent him to a detention center in either Mexico, Nicaragua or Egypt.   If they want to send him to one of those...I don't care other than wasted tax money. This post was edited by my2cents at April 18, 2025 6:14 AM MDT
      April 18, 2025 5:55 AM MDT
    0

  • 17225
    If you honestly believe that, I got this bridge in San Francisco I can offer you at a bargain price. Courts keep records, Garcia has none. His rap sheet is clean as a whistle. Unlike His Royal Orangeness, Garcia had
    No trial
    No evidence
    No due process
    No criminal convictions of any kind

    ICE has already admitted that he was deported due to AN ADMINISTRATIVE ERROR. That means it was a mistake. SCOTUS has ordered that he be returned to the US as a matter of priority, so Trump and the DOJ are absolutely in contempt and anybody else would already be in prison for it.
      April 17, 2025 7:17 PM MDT
    1

  • 35244
    No Due Process? 2 separate courts ruled he is an active gang member (that means there was more than on trial) 
    His wife had a protective order against him for his violence against her. 
    An immigration court (another trial) denied asylum. But did order protection from deportation (to El Salavador) because of fear of RIVAL GANG retaliation.   (This is him admitting to being a MS-13 gang member) He filed for asylum while in the jail from the other court. 

    So 3 courts...established that he is a active member of a violent terrorist gang. And that he is an illegal alien.  So he belongs deported to the El Salavador prison for the gang members.  (He was sent back to his home) which is legal under the Alien Enemies Act. Which was just upheld by SCOTUS.  And Justice Kegan just denied deportation appeals to 4 illegals under her section. 

    Just being in the country illegally is a criminal deportable act.

    The clerical error was not the deportation itself but just in where he was deported to.  He did have a order not to return to El Salavador.  (RIVAL gang was there...However that gang no longer exists)  He was still supposed to be deported but sent to a detention center in either,  Mexico, Egypt or Nicaragua.    Personally,  I don't care as long as he does not set foot back in the US. We have enough criminals and gangs members here already. This post was edited by my2cents at April 18, 2025 10:16 AM MDT
      April 18, 2025 5:38 AM MDT
    0

  • 4439
    "Xinis questioned the evidence an immigration judge used to determine that Abrego Garcia is a gang member. She said in a ruling that he has no criminal record in the United States or El Salvador and that the “‘evidence’ against Abrego Garcia consisted only of his Chicago Bulls hat and hoodie, and a vague, uncorroborated allegation from a confidential informant claiming he belonged to MS-13’s ‘Western’ clique in New York — a place he has never lived.” 

    As far as the temporary restrining order:

    “After surviving domestic violence in a previous relationship, I acted out of caution after a disagreement with Kilmar by seeking a civil protective order in case things escalated,” Vasquez Sura said in a statement Wednesday. “Things did not escalate, and I decided not to follow through with the civil court process."

    Department of Homeland Security posted on social media earlier Wednesday that Abrego Garcia’s wife had sought a temporary protective order against him in 2021. The case was ultimately dismissed.  


    https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/new-documents-government-case-mistakenly-deported-abrego-garcia-gang-rcna201665

      April 18, 2025 8:43 AM MDT
    0

  • 35244
    To get the ruling saying he should not be deported to El Salavador....HE had to admit to being a member of MS-13.   The IMMIGRATION judge ruled he was and would be in danger if send there.  That rival gang no longer exists.  But MS-13 does. And it is a terrorist gang. 

    Why doesn't the leftist media ever pick a hero to defend who is not a thug? 
      April 18, 2025 10:20 AM MDT
    0

  • 4439
    Why can't you accept that virtually every article about this guy says he has NO CRIMINAL RECORD EITHER IN EL SALVADOR OR HERE?

    I don't even know why I bother to respond to you.  You wouldn't accept any discussion unless it comported with YOUR opinion.  I'm done.
      April 18, 2025 1:02 PM MDT
    0

  • 35244
    He is a illegal. He entered the country ILLEGALLY that alone it a crime. 
     

    THREE separate judges agreed that he is an active member of MS-13.   His wife filed abuse charges against him. 

    Just entering the country illegally and then beating his wife is enough for me to give him a boot in the a$$ out of the country.  Good riddance... This post was edited by my2cents at April 18, 2025 2:19 PM MDT
      April 18, 2025 1:49 PM MDT
    0

  • 11560

    Maybe things like this is the reason for not being able to accept:

    Trump posed with what appears to be a digitally altered image and claimed Kilmar Abrego Garcia has got MS-13 tattooed onto his knuckles. There are resent photos that show he doesn't have that tattoo. Cheers and happy weekend! 


      April 19, 2025 10:08 AM MDT
    1

  • 35244
      April 19, 2025 11:39 AM MDT
    0

  • 4439
    I saw that article and it also said that the poicture was photoshot photoshopped.  I searched for photos of him and there were several that showed what appeared to be no inger tats at all.

    EDIT TO ADD:  Look at his left hand in this photo.  Doesn't appear to have tattoos on his fingers.

    FOX6's Suzanne Spencer This post was edited by Spunky at April 19, 2025 3:06 PM MDT
      April 19, 2025 2:53 PM MDT
    0

  • 11560

    You can also tell by the photo that he is a loving father. I hope he someday gets to sue the pants off Trump. Cheers and happy weekend!

      April 19, 2025 3:16 PM MDT
    1

  • 35244
    What is his wife hiding in this picture she posted to her social media?

    I see knuckle tattoos clearly in this picture with the grifting Dem in El Salavador.  
    This post was edited by my2cents at April 19, 2025 7:35 PM MDT
      April 19, 2025 6:47 PM MDT
    0

  • 11560

    I could photo shop a couple of hearts on Trump’s hand – and claim that it is hiding Trump’s Apple Dumpling Gang tattoo.

      April 20, 2025 8:35 AM MDT
    0

  • 35244
    That is a screenshot of his wife's photo SHE posted.   
      April 20, 2025 10:38 AM MDT
    0

  • 11647
    Both sides are photo shopping. But this issue is about due process, not tattoos.

      April 20, 2025 7:49 AM MDT
    1

  • 4439
    You are 100% correct.  The issue is Constitutional rights to due process whether here legally or not.  That is a point that seems to be missed.  Perhaps the phrase "due process" is not understood.
      April 20, 2025 9:04 AM MDT
    1