Active Now

ENG / LLVF - formerly of AB
Gino LOLobrigida
Discussion » Questions » Legal » Does the breaker of the Constitution realize that calling the NFL and demanding that players be fired is against the constitution?

Does the breaker of the Constitution realize that calling the NFL and demanding that players be fired is against the constitution?

Posted - September 25, 2017

Responses


  • 46117
    (CNN)Rather than taking a knee, most NFL players opted for a show of unity Sunday, locking arms ahead of their games amid criticism from President Trump who slammed players opting to protest during the national anthem.
    Still, plenty opted to kneel during "The Star-Spangled Banner," with the Baltimore Ravens' Terrell Suggs and Tampa Bay Buccaneers' Mike Evans among the stars following the lead of former pro quarterback Colin Kaepernick, who pioneered the anthem protests last year over what he was said was social and racial injustice.
    Kaepernick, who has sat and knelt during the anthem, has said he refused to honor a song or "show pride in a flag for a country that oppresses black people and people of color." He also referenced the shootings of black men by police as one of reasons for his stance. "To me, this is bigger than football and it would be selfish on my part to look the other way," he told NFL Media. "There are bodies in the street and people getting paid leave and getting away with murder."

    Ahead of a Sunday morning game in London and afternoon games, players from several teams, including the New England Patriots, Jacksonville Jaguars, Cleveland Browns, the Denver Broncos and the Miami Dolphins, took knees during the anthem. With the exception of one player, the Pittsburgh Steelers didn't even take the field until the anthem was over. The Seattle Seahawks and Tennessee Titans also chose not to take the field for the national anthem.
    In Sunday morning tweets, Trump renewed his criticism of the protests, slamming the league's ratings and saying players should be fired or suspended for such protests. On Saturday, he called for NFL owners to fire any "son of a bitch" who "disrespects our flag."
    "What you just saw was a variety of responses with the theme of unity," an NFL
      September 25, 2017 9:09 AM MDT
    0

  • 1233
    You should be embarrassed by your legal ignorance.

    "CONGRESS shall make no LAW respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

    The 1st amendment is a restriction on the CONGRESS passing LAWS that abridge freedoms by the force of the state, not on the president criticizing unamerican scum.

    Nobody is questioning the right to free speech or to protest, we just think they're scum and we're going to say so. They're free to continue doing what they're doing and we're free to keeping calling them scum.

    The hypocrisy of the left is beyond belief. The left routinely gets people fired for speech that violates political correctness. This is no different than suggesting that someone should be fired for making a racist remark at work. It's not about free speech. It's about whether the employer wishes to continue associating with scum. Society has ALWAYS dealt with scum by social ostracization. 

    Call this right wing political correctness if you will. We are gong to f***ing destroy these people because they deserve to be destroyed. This post was edited by Zeitgeist at May 25, 2018 7:20 AM MDT
      September 25, 2017 1:59 PM MDT
    3

  • 5354
    Every big business gets crank calls.
    As long as the caller don't threaten violence they just ignore it.
      September 25, 2017 5:13 PM MDT
    0

  • 7776
    Sure it is, but try to get this Congress to move on it.
      September 25, 2017 5:18 PM MDT
    0

  • 2500
    Against the Constitution you say? Can you show where what he said is violating the Constitution? 
      September 25, 2017 5:48 PM MDT
    0