Active Now

Element 99
Shuhak
Discussion » Questions » Politics » What should scare us about Trump’s porn star scandal

What should scare us about Trump’s porn star scandal

I found this by putting together 2 unlikely words in a google search "Trump" and "porn".

ref:  What should scare us about Trump’s porn star scandal

Posted - January 23, 2018

Responses


  • 10052
      January 28, 2018 10:58 AM MST
    0

  • 7280
    How's the weather there in Brigadoon?
      January 28, 2018 4:13 PM MST
    0

  • 13277
    Don't know. I live in Brooklyn.
      January 28, 2018 5:21 PM MST
    0

  • 7280
    Speaks even less well for the Trump supporters then and now that don't yet realize how dangerous he is.
      January 28, 2018 4:15 PM MST
    0

  • 13277
    OK.
      January 28, 2018 5:22 PM MST
    0

  • 6477
    That he has had affairs, paid women for sex etc. etc shouldn't surprise us - anyone who didn't know that really has their head in the sand.. The point is that what it does show, along with the billion other things he's done, including PROVEN lies on so many occasions - is that this is a man who cannot be trusted.. Trust a liar and what do you get? Well we all know that.. but people will still bleat about it when the sh*t hits the fan. 
      January 28, 2018 4:16 AM MST
    1

  • 13277
    Ah, but you bleat as much as anyone, and you don't even live or vote in our country. You couldn't and didn't vote against him, so what right have you to complain?
      January 28, 2018 9:52 AM MST
    2

  • 6477
    I find it interesting how you evade and deflect... I wonder if you are aware that you do that? Almost always the deflection is a distraction... and doesn't address the point made.. 
    So let's deal with your comments. I never said I don't blast as much as anyone..  although factually, I don't as I am barely here more than a few hours of an evening... and if you counted statistically I do more than some but not as much as others.. so your statement there was distracting but not factually true.  However, in the interests of honesty, I freely admit.. here ya go.. I despise the ground the incompetent idiot walks on - there, the secrets out :P:  

    if we are being factual and not engaging in pseudo attempts at belittling, then obviously I have a right to comment on him, or indeed anyone in the world..I can comment on him, on Jong, on May, on Darwin - or anyone.. tis freedom of speech etc.. I don't have to have the right to vote on someone in order to comment on them and their leadership :P  You are aware no doubt that my voice of revulsion and disgust is but one of many, many, many worldwide and within your own country...

    Let's face it, were I siding with the sentiments expressed on this thread my comments would be welcomed.. it's only that they aren't that rankles :P 
      January 28, 2018 11:22 AM MST
    0

  • 13277
    You still haven't explained your whopper about "charges of purgatory," nor have you explained why you have the right to say anything when you don't live or vote in the US. Unlike you, I voted against him. What's your excuse?
      January 28, 2018 11:31 AM MST
    1

  • 6477
    Me thinks you need to look closer my friend. And again the use of the word whopper is designed to belittle and cast  unfavourable light...one wonders why you feel you have to resort to personal belittling in your responses. 
      January 28, 2018 11:41 AM MST
    0

  • 13277
    No belittling intended, just stating facts. You didn't vote against him, did you? This post was edited by Stu Spelling Bee at January 28, 2018 12:05 PM MST
      January 28, 2018 12:05 PM MST
    0

  • 6477
    With respect... there was an absence of facts there.. I am sorry you don't seem to recognise or accept that.. but that's not an issue we should go into here. Factually you stated, that I had dreamed it.. now since I didn't and since you cannot know, and have no reason to believe, truthfully, that I did - it *was* belittling and probably intentionally so.  I did address the points re voting for him and my inalienable right to free speech and to discuss any member of any country. Whether I voted for him or not.. example.. I didn't vote for Theresa May but I can talk about her as can you.. I didn't vote for Winston Churchill but I can talk about him.. I didn't vote for Van Gogh but.. you get the picture :P If it helps I despised Trump way before he was elected - so at least I am consistent :P  
      January 28, 2018 12:17 PM MST
    0

  • 13277
    Is it not a fact that you don't live or vote in the US and thus did not vote against Trump as I did?
      January 28, 2018 12:31 PM MST
    0

  • 6477
    And you surely know me well enough to say.... that your focusing on one, yes one, *fact* is either consciously or unconsciously entirely overlooking all the other facts which weren't facts :P 
    In real life you and I would have such a blast debating :P
      January 28, 2018 12:36 PM MST
    0

  • 7280
    She did in fact explain "the charges of purgatory" comment---perhaps you didn't read her answer to that.

    And she is simply agreeing with the rest of the world when she giver her opinion of Trump.
      January 28, 2018 4:25 PM MST
    0

  • 13277
    And perhaps you didn't read and follow the discussion as it unfolded and thus are unaware of the sequence of our comments. When unsure of what one is talking about, a wise person would stay out of a discussion not involving him.
      January 28, 2018 5:18 PM MST
    1

  • 7939
    FYI, this is an open forum. Anyone is free to comment on anything, so long as they can do so in a respectful manner, without insulting the other parties involved, regardless of whether they were part of the initial discussion, and regardless of the country they live in. 

    With that said, I would urge everyone on this thread to focus on the actual topic at hand, and refrain from discussing other members at all. None of that has ANYTHING to do with the question, nor people's opinions on the topic.
      January 28, 2018 9:07 PM MST
    1

  • 7792
    The horrors this woman saw as donjohn took his clothes off.
      January 28, 2018 9:40 AM MST
    2

  • 7280
    Perhaps the money wasn't to simply keep silent---it may have been necessary for counseling after such trauma.
      January 28, 2018 4:21 PM MST
    1

  • 14795
    He's an avid believer in pay and display situation and just loves Assets stripping ...:)D
      January 28, 2018 11:21 AM MST
    1

  • 13277
    Nothing that didn't scare us about the randy escapades of Presidents Kennedy and Clinton.
      January 28, 2018 11:39 AM MST
    3

  • 6477
    Yea but at least they were better looking :P As you seem to love replying to my comments, I thought I'd follow suit  :P 
      January 28, 2018 11:52 AM MST
    1