Active Now

Slartibartfast
Discussion » Questions » Environment » In which ways would life be different if the oceans were fresh water as opposed to being salt water? ~

In which ways would life be different if the oceans were fresh water as opposed to being salt water? ~

Posted - December 17, 2018

Responses


  • 44619
    Impossible to say. Life as it is today evolved in a saline environment. Even our blood has dissolved salts, necessary for our nervous system to work properly. I suppose life could have evolved in a fresh water environment and would possibly be similar to that of fresh water lakes. Other than that, I can't imagine anything else.
      December 17, 2018 6:46 AM MST
    3

  • 13395
    There would be no such terms as 'salty sailor' or 'an old salt'.
      December 17, 2018 7:28 AM MST
    2

  • Ocean liners and large yachts wouldn't need desalination units aboard.

    Southern California wouldn't be dependent on another U.S. state for their water.

    Some species of sea animals would die. Tuna for one.
      December 17, 2018 8:12 AM MST
    2

  • 10642
    If the oceans remained freshwater, Earth would be a barren ball of ice or a lifeless "oven" like Venus.  The salinity in the oceans comes from rain/snow run-off.  For them to remain fresh water, would mean it never rained. 
    As rain falls, it erodes the land (rocks, soil, minerals).  The minerals, acids and such in these materials along with sediment, are washed into rivers which in turn empty out into the oceans.  When the water in the oceans evaporates (to become rain once again) the other stuff is left behind, thus giving the seas their "salt" content.
    The reason why the oceans haven't become a lifeless "salt mass"over the years is that sediments (dirt, sand) trap some of the "saltiness" below the seafloor.  Subduction (where the earth's crust is being pushed/pulled back down into the mantle) helps to "recycle" some of the seafloor.

    Assuming evaporation still existed, the earth would have quickly become shrouded in a thick blanket of clouds.  Eventually, all the water on the planet's surface would be in the atmosphere.  This, coupled with normal CO2 (from volcanoes and such) would have either made the planet very hot (like Venus) or tuned it into a frozen ball of ice.  Either way, life as we know it could not have existed.
      December 17, 2018 10:10 AM MST
    4

  • 8214
    Yay! Great simple explination.  
      December 17, 2018 1:09 PM MST
    2

  • 53509
    CheckSpell. 
    __
      December 17, 2018 10:51 PM MST
    0

  • 5835
    For starters, the oceans would be deeper and sea level the same everywhere. Right now the Atlantic is saltier than the Pacific, and the extra density pushes sea level about ten feet lower. That is why the Panama Canal has to have locks.

    Here is an experiment you can do. Put a small amount of water in your nose. Notice that you don't like the feeling. Now mix 1/2 tsp salt in a cup of water and put that in your nose. That feels ok. The difference is why salt water fish usually don't swim into fresh water rivers and fresh water fish usually don't swim out. This post was edited by Not Sure at December 30, 2018 5:05 PM MST
      December 17, 2018 1:32 PM MST
    1

  • 22891
    it would probably be cleaner
      December 17, 2018 3:40 PM MST
    1

  • 3719
    How? The seas would still be absorbing everything washed, falling or flowing into them.
      December 17, 2018 4:38 PM MST
    1

  • 1812
    Instead of hypothesizing,  let's desalanate all the oceans ...and find out. 
      December 17, 2018 11:40 PM MST
    2

  • 13395
    Where would you put all the mountains of salt recovered from the oceans so it doesn't wash back in? There is a lot of gold and other minerals dissolved in the ocean water that could be worth fortunes. This post was edited by Kittigate at December 30, 2018 5:06 PM MST
      December 18, 2018 5:54 AM MST
    2

  • 1812
    Let's put it all in storage lockers.
      December 30, 2018 4:30 PM MST
    2

  • 5835
    At one part per million you must process 7,812 gallons of water to get one ounce of gold, which is worth a little over 1,200 bux. 

    I didn't calculate the salt. The question is how do you separate one ounce of something from 7,812 gallons of water?
      December 31, 2018 6:41 AM MST
    1

  • 13395
    I dunno. I guess nobody has ever found an efficient means to do that. 


      December 31, 2018 3:38 PM MST
    0