Peter Kadzik of the DOJ sent an email from his private account to John Podesta who is hillary's campaign chair to update on the status of state department emails investigation. He ... morePeter Kadzik of the DOJ sent an email from his private account to John Podesta who is hillary's campaign chair to update on the status of state department emails investigation. He even made the subject of the email "heads up". This is back in 2015.This same Kadzik is the one who sent a letter to democrats in congress saying that the DOJ would make sure the put the resources to make sure the new email investigation went "expeditiously". He is a long time friend of John Podesta. John even says peter "kept him out of prison".Is this obvious collusion ok?Do even hillary supporters now understand why people do not trust the DOJ? less
The classic question of who polices the police? A senior DOJ official has assured democrats in congress that the hillary investigation will be done as quickly as possible.&nb... moreThe classic question of who polices the police? A senior DOJ official has assured democrats in congress that the hillary investigation will be done as quickly as possible. That official is also friends and was a lawyer for the hillary campaign chair john podesta. John Podesta say that this official kept him out of jail. So if the DOJ is in the pocket of the hillary campaign and will cover up for that reason then who prosecutes that?
Peter Kadzik sent this letter and he is a long time friend of John Podesta and even worked as a lawyer for podesta with podesta saying he "kept me out of jail" when podesta was rec... morePeter Kadzik sent this letter and he is a long time friend of John Podesta and even worked as a lawyer for podesta with podesta saying he "kept me out of jail" when podesta was recommending him for a job in Obama justice department. Kadzik's son wanted to work on the clinton campaign.This person is the senior at the department of justice that is assuring that they will dedicate resources to make sure the clinton email investigation is done expeditiously as possible.Are they not making this far too obvious that the investigation will be compromised?Can anyone on either side of this believe that this is ok? less
Hello:They're gonna play a dying game. The court is now four to four. But, two liberal justices and one right winger are ancient. Here's the key to their game - t... moreHello:They're gonna play a dying game. The court is now four to four. But, two liberal justices and one right winger are ancient. Here's the key to their game - the libs are older. If ONE of 'em dies that'll make the court four to three in favor of the right wingers. Is that a good plan? Is it what the framers had in mind?excon
In 1992, Bush v Clinton just 4 days before election FBI indicts Bush's Sec of Defense....http://www.headlineoftheday.com/2016/10/29/bush-secretary-of-defense-indicted-four-da... moreIn 1992, Bush v Clinton just 4 days before election FBI indicts Bush's Sec of Defense....http://www.headlineoftheday.com/2016/10/29/bush-secretary-of-defense-indicted-four-days-before-clinton-election/So how is this unprecedented? Clinton certainly wasn't complaining in 1992.
