Muggers, please help us refine our photo policies. Would you consider the photo here appropriate for the main areas of the site or only appropriate in the adult section?

TM~ 

TM~ 

SH~ How on earth can you possibly say :

  with content of a sexual character which this photo isn't showing at all. IMO.

GET REAL!!!!

This is not Mother Teresa.

There is nothing about this picture that is not perverted sex, and should only be in the adult section.

Peapod~  

Nicko~ 

thepie~ it is important to a lot of people

Rpf ~ We finally agree on something.

                        

some1~ It is a big issue.

To clarify, I said if they were photos most of us wouldn't think of as sexual, they would be fine. I'm not going to ban elbows if someone comes along with an elbow fetish. Most of us don't think feet or elbows are sexual, so I don't treat them as such.

However, people are sexual. Children or not. When a fetus in the womb masturbates and toddlers and kids diddle themselves and explore each other's bits it is sexual. Them not knowing what they are doing other than just feeling good does not make it non-sexual.

How do you suggest children to be taught sex ed? Should its parents have sex in front of the kid to show 'realistic' expectation of sexual activity?

The photo is sexually arousing IMHO. But even child-friendly photos can be sexually arousing so I would not know what to say to your question,

What's bothering me plenty is the line on the top woman's thigh. It's driving me mad at this point. Is that a photo defect? Or a tattoo?

It's a garter strap.

It doesn't show any naughty parts, therefore I don't think it would be filtered in a public library. That would make it OK for the main areas of the site. I wouldn't censor it.

 to D&D,

I disagree that self-pleasuring in childhood is sexual.

In my view it is sensual.

The two are very different,

even though in teen-agers and adults sexuality and sensuality blend together.

Even though Silverwings and I often disagree on many things, I think most of what she says on this issue is correct and very well proven by expert and thorough research.

To me, your last question sounds sarcastic, rather than sincere. There are plenty of ways for parents and schools to teach the facts appropriately. I've been a teacher and have taught the subject - it's not difficult.

SHOUTING!!!

Are you shouting at me? Get real yourself and act appropriately. I will leave out my perspectives on Mother Thereasa and what, or how I look at you and your behaving around this place. It's far from a Christian worthy in my view. Then again, I'm not the one to judge you as I won't believe in a book written by people back in history who tried to create a world order to keep their people under their power.

Let me give you some free sex ed. Sex is a natural, wonderful and beautiful thing. Not perverted. But I guess your reference goes towards it being to women in a closer moment that is your concern. I refuse to live by your book. I let by the law. As far as I know your country as mine does rule by law, and it's written into the constitution that church and state are separated. GET REAL!!! (To quote yourself, sorry leaving out the bold and the underline, I hope you can live with that!)

This photo has nothing to do with perverted sex. It must be impossible for you to go out your door without having "perverted sex" thrown in your face. To watch television unless your on one of the bible channels. To get online. GET REAL!!!

If you want to talk with me you're going to show the same respect you demand for yourself or you just sound like an empty barrel with nothing inside it but empty air. Go study your stuff.

Don't expect kids not watching tv just because you don't watch it. Don't expect the youngsters here at this site to have the same ways using the Internet than you.

What are the youngest members of your household?

You've shown yourself, that you have no issue going into a thread of someone else to make your own comments. Why do you expect something different for your own remark made? Double standards?

Thrifty, you're violating your own expectations to others one more time. And please get your facts real, not to manipulate more than necessary. ToS is staying you have to be 14+ to be here. NOT 13 as you keep telling around this place, even after you were told its 14. Do you really feel the need to exaggerate how young people can be to stay here?

*like*

Right so...

Ikr. I don't watch them. They are too vulgar. But I know a lot of teens are watching them. Luckily mine are not interested in them.

Are you a moderator? Are you censoring what someone can say, and how they can say it? Is your opinion of higher importance than others? Keep the tone real. Show respect towards others if you want to maintain your own respect. Just saying. Bare in mind.

It isn't, that said there is no sex going on in that photo. Hmm.

I see your irritation. I'm not active in other places, and if I were I wouldn't be comparing or talking down on the photo restrictions one place or another. It's simply not that important to me. I do want to be able to share with my friends the photos I find lovely.

I know it's not possible with private albums as it looks. It would still however make it possible to not having a photo like this one out in the open where very religious people not acknowledging the LGBT rights would have to watch them. They aren't filthy or perverted as stated by some of them. No one forces people to be my friends, and if they disliked my photos they could pick the choice to remove the friendship. It would be a solution where everyone would be happy. I am aware it can be misused, and that will be the reason why it's not possible as it is. Sighs.

Mmhmmm. It's what the holy people tell us. Love is apparently a sin, and filth. Smh. Nah, didn't help, I still find them hypocrites. Meh.

I have not been a regular TV viewer for years..  I am glad thats one source of contamination i am no longer exposing myself to...