Muggers, please help us refine our photo policies. Would you consider the photo here appropriate for the main areas of the site or only appropriate in the adult section?

I still can't see.a.bible in that picture, what do you mean?

Seriously.   Can't believe this is even an issue of discussion.

a) I love photos like this.
b) I know both men and women who like photos like this.

Still,
c) It isn't really "family friendly" or "safe for work".  I mean, if this was posted in a high school classroom, would it be OK?  If I posted it on my office door at work, would it be OK?  Clearly: "no" to both.

If this site allows minors, and has a way to move such content to an area that doesn't allow the minors, my 2¢ is that you should.

However, if minors can still reach the "adult" part of the site (because there are no effective access restrictions)... then why bother trying to segregate this content?  Putting it in a notional "adult area" is only likely to draw those with prurient interests.

Nope, not OK for main site. This post was edited by Thriftymaid at September 29, 2016 4:23 AM MDT

Photo posted just to slap people in the face. Nix.

It's sexual in nature and should not be in the main areas.  This post was edited by Benedict Arnold at September 29, 2016 12:07 PM MDT

Guys. Look up the date this question was posted, and next look up the conclusion. It's all inside the threads.

The TOS wasn't changed and haven't been challenged again. The only reason why this question comes up again is because it's among the top answered questions.

A few of you (if not most) already shared your opinion back then, and nothing has changed then. You should be aware, unless you want to start it all over again, which would surprise me as you're arguing to keep the TOS as they are interpreted Already.

Enjoy your day and the new aM vers. 2.0. :-)

I don't think it's bad.  You can see something similar on TV commercials.

Personally I see nothing wrong with the photo. No children were harmed in the taking of this photo.

Parents are responsible for the development of their children not everyone else. Parents of young children who let their children on websites unsupervised is the problem. 

The solution is make the site for 18+ and other sites for <18.
Having to constantly decide what is appropriate for one person and not another is getting old. You can't please everyone.
Make the site 18+ and problem solved.

This image is not appropriate at all. For one, her foot is frigging huge! And the more you look at it, the bigger it gets!

Also, the other chick only has 4 fingers.

I was gearing up for a good time when I first looked at the image, I mean, on paper it sounds awesome...

"Hey Wade, wanna see 2 chicks getting it on in the back of cheap taxi?"

"Well fudge yes my trusted friend, point me in the right direction, I would love to have a gander, what could possibly go wrong"

**Narration of my inner monologue**......"what could possibly go wrong", boy was my life going to be a shambles, if only I had known, but how could I, I was young, free, easily excitable and...............so naive. What happened next isn't the faint hearted.....

"Well, come, follow me Wade, I'll show you these chicks!!"

**Narration of my inner monologue**......I approached the taxi door with excitement, I was nervous, like a little boy opening his first ever Christmas present and as I yanked the taxi door open, I saw to female faces, blood rushed through my veins, my eyes beamed, taking in all that they could, I was focused.....my brain was working hard, trying to decipher the information, and at first, it was clouded by the boost of adrenaline, but the moment that rush was over, I saw the reality.............these "2 chicks"......were.............Bigfoot..and...lobster claw..hand girl?

In the end, I went home, ate a bag of potato chips.

Moral of the story? You decide.

hahaha, you need to ask?  That is for the adult section for sure. 

If they were a man and a woman, or two men, I'd cringe. Adult.