I had dental insurance when I was employed. However, I don't have dental insurance since my retirement from employment. I recently paid 2,600 dollars for my first root ... moreI had dental insurance when I was employed. However, I don't have dental insurance since my retirement from employment. I recently paid 2,600 dollars for my first root canal, and I am undecided if dental insurance is worth buying.
Inspired by this question that was posted by another member: https://answermug.com/forums/topic/129520/what-is-something-you-looked-at-liked-bought-then-after-a-peri~
My mouth opened in astonishment when I saw a customer count ten 100-dollar bills to pay for his purchase of caviar. I recently made a cash payment of 1,100 dollars for my dent... moreMy mouth opened in astonishment when I saw a customer count ten 100-dollar bills to pay for his purchase of caviar. I recently made a cash payment of 1,100 dollars for my dental bill.
Hello:I've always been on the wrong end of car deals. I owned a 1958 Chevy Impala - sold it.. I owned a 1966 Volkswagen window van with a Porsche engine.. It's go... moreHello:I've always been on the wrong end of car deals. I owned a 1958 Chevy Impala - sold it.. I owned a 1966 Volkswagen window van with a Porsche engine.. It's gone. My first car was a '46 Ford. Chopped the top off.. Any one of 'em could send my grandchildren through college.excon
*This concerns personal debts only, not rent, mortgage, dues, auto loans, bank loans, student loans, interest, late fees, court costs, official judgments, layaway fees, recurring p... more*This concerns personal debts only, not rent, mortgage, dues, auto loans, bank loans, student loans, interest, late fees, court costs, official judgments, layaway fees, recurring payments as part of a budget, etc.**For instance, the person forgave you the debt, or you lost contact with each other, or you intentionally withheld the payback, or your country’s currency became devalued, or . . .~
massive population of homeless people? Of course, the intended recipients were the unemployed people of the state, many of whom are/were also homeless, so the money should ha... moremassive population of homeless people? Of course, the intended recipients were the unemployed people of the state, many of whom are/were also homeless, so the money should have been applied to them first and foremost. Not much accountability nor responsibility has been ascertained for culpability of any state government official or officials who were expected to safeguard the funds, no negative consequences have befallen them, and much of the fraud was made easier for the perpetrators because of the My question is geared toward a view of “if the money is going somewhere other than its purposeful destination, homeless people would have been better served if they had received it instead of thieves”.~ less
