You do not have to agree. As long as they pay you whatever THEY say is fair you have no recourse. Your Constitution in action AGAINST the little guy and for THE BIG GUYS. Ever it s... moreYou do not have to agree. As long as they pay you whatever THEY say is fair you have no recourse. Your Constitution in action AGAINST the little guy and for THE BIG GUYS. Ever it shall be thus. Even way back when the rich and powerful got to get whatever they wanted. Isn't that swell? Proud of them I betcha y'all are. Until YOUR property is stolen via Eminent Domain. Then I betcha your tune will change. But then you may be "special" and support whatever your government for you as well as to you.
Do you ADMIRE them for their courage and brave stance or do you think they are guilty as he** and afraid to tell the truth? I think taking the fifth is an admission of guilt. A way... moreDo you ADMIRE them for their courage and brave stance or do you think they are guilty as he** and afraid to tell the truth? I think taking the fifth is an admission of guilt. A way to lie by omission. Stonewalling. What do YOU think and why?
It's very SPOOKY pooky. Nothing about conspiracy or obstruction of justice at all? After 22 months this is it? How do we reconcile all the fallout and charges and investigations an... moreIt's very SPOOKY pooky. Nothing about conspiracy or obstruction of justice at all? After 22 months this is it? How do we reconcile all the fallout and charges and investigations and GUILTY pleas of all those who worked on behalf of the Don of Dons? Did they dood it for themselves or to aggrandize themselves in his eyes so he would....ya know.. be VERY GRATEFUL and reward them? So he skates and they fry? How is that plausible?
Defrauding a bank to get loans based on phony figures. Shades of Don don! Sheesh. Once upon a time he a hero. Now he is a zero. When does he become a less-than?
The fault does not lie in our stars. The fault lies in the eye of the beholder...not the beheld.The beheld exists as is. What the beheld is...is imputed to her/him/it by the eye of... moreThe fault does not lie in our stars. The fault lies in the eye of the beholder...not the beheld.The beheld exists as is. What the beheld is...is imputed to her/him/it by the eye of the beholder. So it is not that say for example Don don has any faults at all. It is we who behold him unflatteringly who are at fault here.Hmm. Who knew?
Were you angry, disappointed? Or just puzzled as to why anyone would do it?Here's the thing. I'm puzzled by the Mueller report. I think STOIC kicked in so I'm not angry or upset...... moreWere you angry, disappointed? Or just puzzled as to why anyone would do it?Here's the thing. I'm puzzled by the Mueller report. I think STOIC kicked in so I'm not angry or upset...but I am puzzled. Maybe when the final chapter is written by the SDNY and someone writes THE END I'll know more and be able to assess the value of all that has been going on. Right now? Puzzled is all I got. What about you? Are you puzzled too?
Fiction. Reality. History. Revisionist history. To BElieve or not to BElieve. That is the question. You base belief on its source? Of course? How do you know the source isn't... more Fiction. Reality. History. Revisionist history. To BElieve or not to BElieve. That is the question. You base belief on its source? Of course? How do you know the source isn't false a lie untrue?
