We have two nuclear plants nearby,, but they are just part of the grid. Our plant is clean-coal fired and the smoke is scrubbed. You can't even see the exhaust.
"Clean" coal is a furphy, it doesn't exist. You can scrub the soot but CO2 is colourless. Digging the stuff up also releases a buttload of methane, which is worse from a greenhouse point of view.
This post was edited by Slartibartfast at August 24, 2022 5:35 PM MDT
It's in a GREENHOUSE. The planet isn't one. The idea in a greenhouse is that the plants inside absorb it, but for the rest of the globe there aren't enough plants left to absorb to huge amount of CO2 being pumped into the sky by the burning of fossil fuels. Deforestation in the Amazon basin and the jungles of Southeast Asia (especially in Indonesia) is still continuing apace, and the phytoplankton in the ocean is being decimated in part due to plastics blocking sunlight. I shouldn't have to explain this kind of thing to an adult!
This post was edited by Slartibartfast at August 24, 2022 7:18 PM MDT
You cannot believe that the greenhouses using these machines are sealed airtight so no CO2 is allowed outside of the greenhouse. Again if it is so bad, these machines would not be allowed. Also if it is so bad, these global climate leaders would not all fly their Private jets to the climate conference.
I Goggled Mike Adams and here is what I found about him. Mike Adams is a prolific blogger who is critical of vaccines and medical research, and is pro-gun and pro-survivalist. He is the founding editor of NaturalNews.com. Many of his posts have been labeled false by scientists. In 2019, Facebook revoked the Natural News Age for violating spam rules. So I am not going to believe him that CO2 is not bad for the plant. Cheers!
This post was edited by Nanoose at August 24, 2022 7:27 PM MDT
WelbyQuentin 