Chaplin was never a US citizen and his visa was revoked in 1946 so he had to go elsewhere. He was just too socialistic for the McCarthy era to accept.But he is still a hugely popul... moreChaplin was never a US citizen and his visa was revoked in 1946 so he had to go elsewhere. He was just too socialistic for the McCarthy era to accept.But he is still a hugely popular actor in the western world. Do you think he would be OK for US immigration today?
I thought of this idea during a MUN conference on the UNFCCC and it seems like something pretty obvious that should already be happening, which is why I'm confused. Since the Trump... moreI thought of this idea during a MUN conference on the UNFCCC and it seems like something pretty obvious that should already be happening, which is why I'm confused. Since the Trump Admin pulled out of Paris and the US is also the second largest fossil fuel producer in the world (China is #1), why haven't progressive countries that are major trading partners of the US passed a UN resolution encouraging these countries to impose economic sanctions of the US until the Trump Admin actually does something about climate change? This seems like the most logical strategy for dealing with the Trump Administration and its dismissal of global warming. What are the technical problems with this solution? Is it not happening already because countries don't want to risk minor detriment to their economies? They might not even have to put their economies on the line, because the resolution would most likely remain an ultimatum—does the US economy suffer more than it already will under Trump, or does White House suck it up ... less
Correct me if I am wrong but that's a whole country made and paid to make amends. Nothing wrong with that intrinsically but you must see the hypocrisy in the reparations issue whic... moreCorrect me if I am wrong but that's a whole country made and paid to make amends. Nothing wrong with that intrinsically but you must see the hypocrisy in the reparations issue which doesn't end there. If no to one then why yes to some?
Twitter, Facebook, and most social media monitor their sites, especially for terrorism. What if one of Donald's tweets was potentially dangerous? He says a lot of crazy things. The... moreTwitter, Facebook, and most social media monitor their sites, especially for terrorism. What if one of Donald's tweets was potentially dangerous? He says a lot of crazy things. They should block his tweets, like they do others. I was blocked for 2 weeks from Instagram, because I "was going too fast". Ha! Of course! I type fast! I posted 4 pics, one after another. Isn't that what Instagram is for? (rolls eyes).
GWB:see: Bush%20say God chose himTrump:Secondary Questions:- Is divine intervention better or worse than Russian intervention?- Can we stop it? - should we?
They were referring to his latest rant against Morning Joe program that continuously tells it like it is as far as the President is concerned. They say he is unbalanced and m... moreThey were referring to his latest rant against Morning Joe program that continuously tells it like it is as far as the President is concerned. They say he is unbalanced and mentally unsound. He doesn't like that. You know they are not LOYAL.President Trump faced a swift and bipartisan backlash on Thursday after he assailed the television host Mika Brzezinski in unusually personal and crude terms, the latest of a string of escalating attacks by the president on the national news media.Shortly before 9 a.m., as Ms. Brzezinski’s MSNBC show “Morning Joe” was ending, Mr. Trump used Twitter to taunt Ms. Brzezinski and her co-host, Joe Scarborough, referring to them as “low I.Q. Crazy Mika, along with Psycho Joe” and describing a meeting with Ms. Brzezinski in which, he said, “she was bleeding badly from a face-lift.”Mr. Trump is famed for his online provocations, but the coarseness of his remark about Ms. Brzezinski — coming from a president who has faced cri... less
