Hillary Clinton's "WHAT HAPPENED" book might be cathartic for her. I don't know too much about what's in it but a couple of things have crept out. She sounds really whiny. She shou... moreHillary Clinton's "WHAT HAPPENED" book might be cathartic for her. I don't know too much about what's in it but a couple of things have crept out. She sounds really whiny. She shouldn't have written it. I think it will cost her more than she will get from it. I could be wrong of course. Would you have written it? Why?
They have ZERO problem trying to censor what you say or how you say it. ZERO. Now isn't that being a hypocrite? They say they don't support censorship figuratively but they will li... moreThey have ZERO problem trying to censor what you say or how you say it. ZERO. Now isn't that being a hypocrite? They say they don't support censorship figuratively but they will literally try to achieve it by silencing you or telling you how to say what you say or not to say it at all. How is that logical, reasonable, sensible, sane?
Mine are:1) People who don't wash their hands after using the bathroom.2) People who are too lazy to put shopping carts in the corrals stores have for them.3) People who are loud.
"They" being his adoring worshippers who are able to ignore everything around them and focus on their prize. They are deaf and blind to anything and everything negative about The D... more"They" being his adoring worshippers who are able to ignore everything around them and focus on their prize. They are deaf and blind to anything and everything negative about The Donald John but "how great thou art"...the "thou" being their revered Donald John. It doesn't matter what proof there is or what guilt there is and what harm is being done they are steady and determined to continue providing aid and comfort and cover. They are, therefore, all co-conspirators and guilty for harboring aiding and abetting their man. Proudly they do it. Certain they are that only they are in step and the rest of the world is not. I wonder where that kind of certainty comes from in light of nothing substantive/rational to support it? less
