entering countries that are more affluent than their own. (This is notwithstanding the manner of entry nor their immigration status upon becoming homeless.)Of course, depending on ... moreentering countries that are more affluent than their own. (This is notwithstanding the manner of entry nor their immigration status upon becoming homeless.)Of course, depending on the conditions of their home countries, being homeless in a more affluent country might not present the same challenges and difficulties to all that might be assumed.Do you know, or have you ever known, an immigrant to your country who is homeless or at any point became homeless?___
Report is that the officer in the most recent killing of Daunte Wright, 20, in Minnesota thought she pulled her taser, but it was her gun. TasersPistols: Sig Sauer... moreReport is that the officer in the most recent killing of Daunte Wright, 20, in Minnesota thought she pulled her taser, but it was her gun. TasersPistols: Sig Sauer, Glock 19 and Glock Gen 4
that’s truly what’s preventing some of them from voting? Valid, unexpired government-issued identification would also help them in many other areas of their lives... morethat’s truly what’s preventing some of them from voting? Valid, unexpired government-issued identification would also help them in many other areas of their lives beyond registering to vote and voting, it would also help them year-round, not just when they’re needed as pawns in election cycles. It’s probable that having identification that doesn’t expire in one, two, three or however many years their jurisdiction issues them for, will open numerous doors for people in need. Such a benefit can hardly have any negative connotations at all.
Multiple multimillionaires and multibillionaires loudly and proudly touted how they provided registration drives, voter education sessions, transportation to polls, and other extremely helpful methods in order to ensure that people would make it to the polls in several local, state and federal elections in 2020. Additionally, some of them paid for bail, bond, parole, probation, appeals, fines, fees, etc. along with legislation and... less
Hypothetically, if an unaccompanied minor who is in a detention setting in the US makes the above statement, what are the possibilities of what might happen as a result of it?1. &n... moreHypothetically, if an unaccompanied minor who is in a detention setting in the US makes the above statement, what are the possibilities of what might happen as a result of it?1. “As a minor, you don’t have the intelligence, maturity, or legal right to decide for yourself; you’re staying.”2. “That’s silly, EVERYONE wants to be in the United States, you’re just homesick and you miss your family for right now, but you’ll soon get over that. Besides, this is best for you anyway; things are horrible in your country.”3. “Even though your opinion is respected, legally it is only a judge who can make that decision for you, so in about a year your case should reach its final conclusion.”4. “We will begin immediately to put you in contact with your family and make the arrangements for you to return to them as soon as possible.”5. There will be no answer, the minor will just be ignored.6. A combination of two o... less
EDIT:
To be clear, my question is facetious and its origins are borne of rife frustration at the rush to claim mental illness as an excuse why someone has murdered someone el... more EDIT:
To be clear, my question is facetious and its origins are borne of rife frustration at the rush to claim mental illness as an excuse why someone has murdered someone else. It’s as if to say, “Well, victim’s family, this death is due to the murderer’s mental problem, so it’s ok.” While I know that is not an accurate rendition, it is an approximation.A majority of you who have answered so far have brought up points about different aftermaths that are applied in cases of murderers being found legally under some type of protection from certain types of “punishments” that would normally face those convicted of this crime. I understand your positions and acknowledge their validity. However, the focus of what I was trying to get across is not about the penalty phase, it’s about the “mental-illness-lessens-the-severity-of-this-murder” phase, which at the same time makes the loss of life less important.
:( less
