So far the play is not captivating or memorable and none of the actors are worthy of awards. Mostly it's boring and repetitive. The scriptwriters are third-rate hacks and will win ... moreSo far the play is not captivating or memorable and none of the actors are worthy of awards. Mostly it's boring and repetitive. The scriptwriters are third-rate hacks and will win no awards for the sparking dialogue or profound insight. We keep looking at our watches wondering "how much longer"? If you look at this display in that way then it becomes less nightmarish. Not a whole lot less but every little bit helps. Ya know?
The testimony was about the Russian Dossier on Trump. Now the Republicans on the committee had no intention of relesing the info. Don't we the people have a RIGHT to know wha... more The testimony was about the Russian Dossier on Trump. Now the Republicans on the committee had no intention of relesing the info. Don't we the people have a RIGHT to know what the he** is going on? Why would our employees (all pols) hide what is going on when national security has nothing to do with it? What is it the Republicans don't want us to know so badly they would withhold information from us? Anyway it's out there and we the people can read it. That is our right isn't it? It would have been better had the release been a bipartisan action. It would have made the Republicans on the committee look better showing there had nothing to hide from us. less
I thought everything that goes on in government must be preserved. Can they just destroy/erase/eliminate whatever they want so the public never knows what, if anything, was discove... moreI thought everything that goes on in government must be preserved. Can they just destroy/erase/eliminate whatever they want so the public never knows what, if anything, was discovered? What is it they want to hide from us that would cause to erase their tracks?
The judge said it was on a "flawed legal premise". Does his ruling apply to the entire country? Does one federal judge overturning something automatically cover the entire country?
Hello everyone ! So, I am desperately searching for WingedWonder. He was unapologetically happily exuberantly beautifully himself, with sprinkles SPARKLES and rainbows and uni... moreHello everyone ! So, I am desperately searching for WingedWonder. He was unapologetically happily exuberantly beautifully himself, with sprinkles SPARKLES and rainbows and unicorns!He is the most loving person and always had a beautiful thing to say to anyone. HE IS a One in this universe.And I just LOVED HIM. AND I MISS HIM. I chatted with him on I.M. about a year and a week ago, on here. It was so GREAT to catch up with him, again. ~~~We were Number ONE as friends on the site R2T! Besties. Then he came here, and I came to SW and we sort of parted our ways.I have come here to seek him and OMG< he is gone from here. I still have his rose. ~~~I knew his first name and it's kind of unusual, and they deleted ALL of our correspondences on R2T (GRRRRRR!) So, as I can't recall his first name, I can not even to try to find him on FB.If you know his name I would really be grateful for you to connect with me on PM and let me know. He is such a lovely peson. ~~~Thank ... less
She may be a better, more humane alternative, but would she be the choice of a people determined to suppress the real conflicts at the heart of the country?
Per an article by Chris Mahon in Science News dated January 8, 2018. How do you get proof of something you cannot access? Does anyone understand this well enough to explain it?
You see someone set fire to a house. You report it. Are the people angry at the arsonist? NO. They get angry at you for reporting it. How in the he** does that make any sense?
