At this point we don't know how many folks wore wires to record incriminating conversations..how many have already testified to the Grand Jury...how many have been given immunity s... moreAt this point we don't know how many folks wore wires to record incriminating conversations..how many have already testified to the Grand Jury...how many have been given immunity so they have nothing to lose and everything to gain by telling all they know. We just don't know. So how would YOU advise Trumpworld folks to comport themselves rolling forward? Assume EVERYONE is wearing a wire and say nothing to anyone at any time? Send no emails? Take no phone calls?. Look straight ahead and wear blinders and earplugs if you must. Don't talk to the press. You can't trust anyone.That will work moving forward but nothing can change what already has happened. What you already said. What you already wrote. What you already did Nothing. Oh my is the sky really falling?:( less
I'm guessing that those who grew up in homes where affection was plentiful are the adult huggers of today while those who grew up in families that were not demonstrative/affectiona... moreI'm guessing that those who grew up in homes where affection was plentiful are the adult huggers of today while those who grew up in families that were not demonstrative/affectionate might be the ones who don't like to be touched. I don't know for sure of course. Just conjecture.
A fair election that wouldn't be tainted I guess is too scary for some...the outcome is unknown since if you don't sabotage you have no control over it. That's how they live their ... moreA fair election that wouldn't be tainted I guess is too scary for some...the outcome is unknown since if you don't sabotage you have no control over it. That's how they live their lives. Sabotaging whatever they can to get an edge so they can win because that is the be all and end of life...winning. Anything else and you might as well be dead. It won't count. So how do you INSURE winning at cards? Stack the deck of course. SIGH. 2018 and 2020 elections will be based on stacked decks and will be even worse. Russia now KNOWS how effective it can be. They are better at it and smarter at it and will be even more so as time goes by. Isn't that a swell tomorrow to which we can all look forward? less
His reasoning(besides the fact that he doesn't believe in climate change being caused by humans) is that he wants to bring on board folks "with more diverse views". Like his I expe... moreHis reasoning(besides the fact that he doesn't believe in climate change being caused by humans) is that he wants to bring on board folks "with more diverse views". Like his I expect since scientists are locked in to FACTS and FACTS annoy the he** outta Pruitt. They don't match his beliefs. So be prepared for non-science folks who will quite likely have ties to the fossil fuel industry. They would be as anti-science a group as any since their dog is in that fight isn't it? But we know that is precisely why The Donald John put Scott Pruitt in charge. The attitude of Trumpworld and its denizens is that anything science-based is VERY BAD. Anything education based is VERY BAD. Anything fact-based is VERY BAD. They try their dam*dest to avoid VERY BAD. less
5 of the 8 who died were visitors from Argentina. One was a visitor from Belgium. One from Massachusetts. I don't know anything about those who were injured or if any of them are c... more5 of the 8 who died were visitors from Argentina. One was a visitor from Belgium. One from Massachusetts. I don't know anything about those who were injured or if any of them are critical. I hope not.
Marcel Just, a Carnegie Mellon Psychology Professor and Director of the Center for Cognitive Brain Imagery, is the inventor/creator. He has spent most of the last decade "tea... moreMarcel Just, a Carnegie Mellon Psychology Professor and Director of the Center for Cognitive Brain Imagery, is the inventor/creator. He has spent most of the last decade "teaching" computer programs how to identify thoughts. He found that each emotion has a specific signature in the brain( as ascertained with the use of MRI technology) and "trained" a piece of software to follow the patterns and recognized about 30 concepts and emotions. He created AI than can read thoughts. He and some colleagues published a paper recently in the journal NATURE. Will such machines replace psychiatrists? Are humans becoming extinct as doers while machines take over all doing? less
