How do you KNOW what existed before you were born? You cannot trust a written record or a recollection. Both can be faulty by natural or purposeful means. We only know what w... moreHow do you KNOW what existed before you were born? You cannot trust a written record or a recollection. Both can be faulty by natural or purposeful means. We only know what we perceive to be true at any specific moment and even then it could be a con a scam a lie. SIGH. Knowing anything for sure? A crapshoot isn't it?
You can apologize and quietly disappear into the woodwork never to be seen or heard from again and live a very quiet life.Or you can play the victim and blame everyone but yourself... moreYou can apologize and quietly disappear into the woodwork never to be seen or heard from again and live a very quiet life.Or you can play the victim and blame everyone but yourself and attack attack attack double down double double down attack attack attack.Or you can make a grand departure (I'm gonna take my marbles and go home) in a very theatrical way with a very haughty demeanor
Of course he also attacks/badmouths/targets Republicans who refuse to become trumpicans. Sometimes very very very cruelly and meanly and disgustingly. No one escapes his venom. All... moreOf course he also attacks/badmouths/targets Republicans who refuse to become trumpicans. Sometimes very very very cruelly and meanly and disgustingly. No one escapes his venom. All red all the time no escape.
What about the rights of WE THE PEOPLE? Ignoring them, crushing them, destroying them is okay with y'all in favor of the right of the super don to impose his wishes on everyone all... moreWhat about the rights of WE THE PEOPLE? Ignoring them, crushing them, destroying them is okay with y'all in favor of the right of the super don to impose his wishes on everyone all the time everywhere? You support that? You revere that? You honor that? You worship it? Why?
In some countries really odd things are considered to be delicacies. It's all in how/what you were fed growing up. Right? Are you really brave foodwise and willing to taste/try any... moreIn some countries really odd things are considered to be delicacies. It's all in how/what you were fed growing up. Right? Are you really brave foodwise and willing to taste/try anything at least once?
I'll tell you why. If it's a puff piece and complimentary he soaks it up and thinks it's due him because of course there is no one as wonderful as he is. If it's not it just ... moreI'll tell you why. If it's a puff piece and complimentary he soaks it up and thinks it's due him because of course there is no one as wonderful as he is. If it's not it just gives him so many more targets to attack. The author(in this case Bob Woodward) AND more importantly all the folks that surround super don who are quoted as saying things about him that make him look like a wackadoodle dipstick. He loves fights. He gets off on them. The more the merrier. Bob Woodward has qioted specific people whom he named. What's a super don to do? It matters not what it's about. He is once again front and center. Senator John McCain and Queen of Soul Aretha Franklin have left the stage and the spotlight is once again on him. He couldn't be happier. Couldn't ask for anything more. Lucky stiff isn't he? less
*The American Automobile Association. They keep sending me membership offers. I keep ignoring them. Over a decade ago, I was planning a cross-country road trip, an... more *The American Automobile Association. They keep sending me membership offers. I keep ignoring them. Over a decade ago, I was planning a cross-country road trip, and I considered joining then, but I was unimpressed with their stated reasons that it would be a good move. ~
(You are not being asked to name the person who sent you the request. Thank you.)
For me, it was because I didn't know anything about the sender, and when I asked for... more (You are not being asked to name the person who sent you the request. Thank you.)
For me, it was because I didn't know anything about the sender, and when I asked for clarification, I received absolutely no reply, which made me assume that I was one of many people caught up in a barrage-request. No loss. ~
She believes that there are too many African-Americans behind bars and that criminal prosecution must focus on white collar crime. OK, but does she actually think that violent crim... moreShe believes that there are too many African-Americans behind bars and that criminal prosecution must focus on white collar crime. OK, but does she actually think that violent crime doesn't matter and that innocent folks get arrested, convicted, and sentenced?She's trailing in polls and is unlikely to win next week's primary, but do you think she's just naive, has a bleeding heart, or both? Criminal defense attorneys are probably licking their chops hoping against hope that she somehow gets elected.
The show is called - Russia Kremlin Putin - it will be a weekly show and it is State run. Basically it's about Putin hiking around Siberia on the weekends while pe... moreThe show is called - Russia Kremlin Putin - it will be a weekly show and it is State run. Basically it's about Putin hiking around Siberia on the weekends while people compliment his physical fitness or say things like - if a bear see's Putin they aren't idiots - they will behave themselves properly. Putin is physically fit but the bear part sounds like propaganda to me. Anyway I bet within a week Trump will be talking or tweeting about the show and say things like - maybe I should do a show or two with him. Cheers! less
Sadly, mine is my dad. I have a legitimate complaint; he’s racist. I love him because he’s my dad, he’s been a great father, and has always treated my mother well... moreSadly, mine is my dad. I have a legitimate complaint; he’s racist. I love him because he’s my dad, he’s been a great father, and has always treated my mother well, but I butt herds with him over his racism and racist comments. I have kicked him out of my home a couple of times for using racial slurs.
All of my mom’s side of the family came from England. Manchester and Stockport to be exact. My dad’s side of the family came from Scotland, Austria, and the Czech Repub... moreAll of my mom’s side of the family came from England. Manchester and Stockport to be exact. My dad’s side of the family came from Scotland, Austria, and the Czech Republic.
I remember the breeder and sire/mother of my first pedigree cat.. I remember the breeders of the others, of course but not usually their pedigree. My first pedigree cat... moreI remember the breeder and sire/mother of my first pedigree cat.. I remember the breeders of the others, of course but not usually their pedigree. My first pedigree cat I *bumped into* when I went to meet a lady about a dog! We were looking for our first family dog and we went to meet the breeder.. to my surprise when we got there we were literally invaded by felines.. And I fell in love with the breed... I saw what I felt was THE most handsome feline ever, his name was Rupert! He was stunning! We got the dog... a puppy but I never forgot the cats... and eventually ended up with a kitten too.. The most awesome feline ever. I still remember his daddy's pedigree name. less
And what they said. Wholesale purges? Departures? Who has back besides his devoted bse all of whom are impotent to save him from truth. Stay tuned. More to come. The unraveling of ... moreAnd what they said. Wholesale purges? Departures? Who has back besides his devoted bse all of whom are impotent to save him from truth. Stay tuned. More to come. The unraveling of a president. Good book title?
They speak as if the 2016 election were legitimate. That the super don of john is legitimate. They ignore all the evidence contrary to this misperception and double down. That is t... moreThey speak as if the 2016 election were legitimate. That the super don of john is legitimate. They ignore all the evidence contrary to this misperception and double down. That is the only way they have to cope with reality. The super don of john has seen to that. Where we go from here is unclear. But they will get there on a magic carpet. Won't they?
More dog and pony show in D.C. by orators and rhetorician Republicans. More of the same. You can count on it. More of the same. More of the same. More of the same. Oh my gawd. More... moreMore dog and pony show in D.C. by orators and rhetorician Republicans. More of the same. You can count on it. More of the same. More of the same. More of the same. Oh my gawd. More of the same? :(
Is it because they think so little of themselves they think that's all they deserve? Embracing and celebrating mediocrity and funky creepy weird odd bizarre stuff is puzzling. SIGH.
It's all they got so they spend 24/7 convincing YOU that it is preferable. Yep. Incomptence and lies is way better than competence and truth! Ya know what is so shattering? Lotsa f... moreIt's all they got so they spend 24/7 convincing YOU that it is preferable. Yep. Incomptence and lies is way better than competence and truth! Ya know what is so shattering? Lotsa folks buy it and support it and defend and get angry when you question them for it. You ask why they settle for so little and they figuratively smack you upside the face. Different strokes.
Person A has 100,000 records/documents covering his/her professional history.Person B has 1,000,000 records/documents covering his/her professional history.Person A submits 99,000 ... morePerson A has 100,000 records/documents covering his/her professional history.Person B has 1,000,000 records/documents covering his/her professional history.Person A submits 99,000 documents or 99% for committee review.Person B submits 100,000 or 10% for committee review Democratic Investigators complain about the lack of documents for Person B and the GOP Committee folks say they have never received more documents for any confirmation.That may be true number wise but percentage wise it is pathetic.So do YOU buy the math they are trying to pass off on ya? You DO KNOW THE DIFFERENCE between 99% and 10% don't you? I wonder why the Republicans on the Senate committee investigating Kavanaugh for SCOTUS Justice don't comprehend it. They probably all flunked math. They don't have a grasp or grip on it. SIGH. More incompetent incompetence front and center in all its glory courtesy of bad math teachers?. :( less
Insisting they be partisan and prejudge everything is against what they are supposed to be But what they are supposed to be is not what you want is it? Not what you bargained for. ... moreInsisting they be partisan and prejudge everything is against what they are supposed to be But what they are supposed to be is not what you want is it? Not what you bargained for. You want a fix that's in. Rigged. A sure thing. A slam dunk. SIGH. Of course you do. Any which way it comes you'll take it.
Because it could hurt their chances in the mid-term elections. So let me get this straight super don of john. Republicans are OFF LIMITS right? Including you of course. Right? That... moreBecause it could hurt their chances in the mid-term elections. So let me get this straight super don of john. Republicans are OFF LIMITS right? Including you of course. Right? That is what your ideal AG would do for you and all your little Republican scairdy sycophantic toadies. Sheesh.
They WANT CONSERVATIVE justices who will overturn Roe vs Wade, which is settled law. They WANT JUSTICES who will prejudge everything in conformance with the Conservative playbookis... moreThey WANT CONSERVATIVE justices who will overturn Roe vs Wade, which is settled law. They WANT JUSTICES who will prejudge everything in conformance with the Conservative playbookis. They do not want Just Justices who will honor SETTLED LAW. They want unjust justices who will overturn it. Who is kidding whom here? You don't want anything decided on its merits. You want everything decided according to your religion and your politics and you do not give a rat's a** about right or wrong. Only conforming to script and liturgy and dogma. Whatta crock! :( less
How do people decide on what to name a child or a business or a book or a song? It seems to me that might be the most critical thing to get right. If it doesn't attract people at a... moreHow do people decide on what to name a child or a business or a book or a song? It seems to me that might be the most critical thing to get right. If it doesn't attract people at all then it doesn't matter how splendid it is no one cares to find out.Of course the things folks find appealing or repulsive are different things. There is that. But doesn't it make sense to choose a name that most people would find appealing so they would be receptive to checking it out? How would you go about naming a business or a restaurant or a special dish on the menu or your latest book or song or your child? less
He OBSTRUCTED the right of President Obama to appoint a JUSTICE of the supreme court. OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE that he got away with but will always be guilty of having done. A BLACK... moreHe OBSTRUCTED the right of President Obama to appoint a JUSTICE of the supreme court. OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE that he got away with but will always be guilty of having done. A BLACK MARK on him forever after. So he and his like-minded cohorts (ilk) continue to support obstruction of justice in all forms particularly when it emanates from the donjohn whose obstruction Began even before the day he took office and continues.What is the moral of this story? There is no moral. No integrity. No justice. No fair play. There is only trumpicans doing the bidding of the leader no matter where it takes them. SIGH. CHIEF JUSTICE OBSTRUCTOR Mitch McConnell will go down in history for his defiance malfeasance irrational partisan political devious deviltry. Congrats Mitch! less
When President Obama was SUPPOSED TO APPOINT A JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT Mitch McConnell obstructed him and prevented him from doing so. The cockamamie wackadoodle excuse ... moreWhen President Obama was SUPPOSED TO APPOINT A JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT Mitch McConnell obstructed him and prevented him from doing so. The cockamamie wackadoodle excuse he gave was that they should wait for the results of the November election and let the people choose who should choose the Justice. Bullsh** rhetoric by obstructors of justice...literally.But they have no problemo letting an unindicted co-conspirator facing many investigations and accusations of criminal and possibly treasonous acitivity including money laundering, conspiracy, collusion, choose whomever he wishes.They opt for a crook's right to do what he wants when he wants how he wants anything and everything individually and collectively. But refuse to let a non-crook do what it is his legal right and what he is entitled to do. Does it make sense? Of course it does to the folks whose world consists only of ALTERNATIVE FACTS, a leader who is quite possibly both a crooked criminal and a traitor. With that they're good. They're fine Th... less
